Artificial intelligence conversational agents in mental health: Patients see potential, but prefer humans in the loop
Разговорные агенты на основе искусственного интеллекта в сфере психического здоровья: пациенты видят потенциал, но предпочитают участие человека
2025-01-31
SCID: 54.1/222d9839
Discuss with AI
AI conversational agentsdata privacyhuman involvementmental healthcarepatient acceptability
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Background: Digital mental health interventions, such as artificial intelligence (AI) conversational agents, hold promise for improving access to care by innovating therapy and supporting delivery. However, little research exists on patient perspectives regarding AI conversational agents, which is crucial for their successful implementation. This study aimed to fill the gap by exploring patients' perceptions and acceptability of AI conversational agents in mental healthcare. Methods: Adults with self-reported mild to moderate anxiety were recruited from the UMass Memorial Health system. Participants engaged in semi-structured interviews to discuss their experiences, perceptions, and acceptability of AI conversational agents in mental healthcare. Anxiety levels were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale. Data were collected from December 2022 to February 2023, and three researchers conducted rapid qualitative analysis to identify and synthesize themes. Results: The sample included 29 adults (ages 19-66), predominantly under age 35, non-Hispanic, White, and female. Participants reported a range of positive and negative experiences with AI conversational agents. Most held positive attitudes towards AI conversational agents, appreciating their utility and potential to increase access to care, yet some also expressed cautious optimism. About half endorsed negative opinions, citing AI's lack of empathy, technical limitations in addressing complex mental health situations, and data privacy concerns. Most participants desired some human involvement in AI-driven therapy and expressed concern about the risk of AI conversational agents being seen as replacements for therapy. A subgroup preferred AI conversational agents for administrative tasks rather than care provision. Conclusions: AI conversational agents were perceived as useful and beneficial for increasing access to care, but concerns about AI's empathy, capabilities, safety, and human involvement in mental healthcare were prevalent. Future implementation and integration of AI conversational agents should consider patient perspectives to enhance their acceptability and effectiveness.
Key Findings
1
Approximately half of participants expressed negative opinions, citing limited empathy, technical shortcomings in complex situations, and data privacy concerns.
2
Most participants preferred keeping humans involved in AI-supported therapy and worried that conversational agents could replace therapists.
3
Patients with mild to moderate anxiety generally viewed AI conversational agents positively, particularly for their potential to improve access to mental healthcare.
4
Some participants favored using AI conversational agents for administrative tasks rather than direct mental healthcare delivery.
5
Successful implementation should incorporate patient perspectives concerning empathy, capabilities, safety, privacy, and appropriate human involvement.
Research Object
AI conversational agents in mental healthcare
Research Subject
Patients’ perceptions, acceptability, perceived benefits and concerns regarding the agents’ utility, empathy, capabilities, safety, privacy, and appropriate level of human involvement
Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-01-31
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
52
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai3
Large language models could change the future of behavioral healthcare: a proposal for responsible development and evaluation2024
Your Robot Therapist Will See You Now: Ethical Implications of Embodied Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry, Psychology, and Psychotherapy2019
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder2006