Corresponding interests: artisans and gentlemen in nineteenth-century natural history
Общие интересы корреспондентов: ремесленники и джентльмены в естествознании XIX века
1994-12-01
SCID: 54.1/29wvfxmg
Discuss with AI
British naturalistsartisans and gentlemenbotanical arrangementnineteenth-century natural historyscientific correspondence
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Early nineteenth-century natural history books reveal that British naturalists depended heavily on correspondence as a means for gathering information and specimens. Edward Newman commented in his History of British Ferns : ‘Were I to make out a list of all the correspondents who have assisted me it would be wearisome from its length.’ Works such as William Withering's Botanical Arrangement show that artisans numbered among his correspondents. However, the literary products of scientific practice reveal little of the workings or such correspondences and how or why they were sustained. An exchange or letters is maintained if the interests of both recipient and writer are satisfied. Withering's book tells us only that his interests were served by his correspondents; it allows us to say nothing with certainty about the interests of those who wrote to him. Published texts effectively hide the means by which the author determined the veracity of distant correspondents and also the way these informants demonstrated their credibility.
Key Findings
1
Artisans, as well as gentlemen, contributed as correspondents to major natural-history works such as William Withering’s Botanical Arrangement.
2
Early nineteenth-century British naturalists relied extensively on correspondence to obtain information and natural-history specimens.
3
Published natural-history texts obscure how correspondence networks operated, including how exchanges were sustained and contributors’ interests were satisfied.
4
These texts do not reliably reveal how authors evaluated information from distant correspondents or how informants established their credibility.
5
Understanding scientific correspondence requires examining the mutual interests and practices underlying exchanges, rather than only their published literary products.
Research Object
correspondence between British naturalists and their artisan and gentleman informants in early nineteenth-century natural history
Research Subject
the mutual interests, maintenance, credibility assessment, and information-and-specimen exchange mechanisms underlying these scientific correspondences
Publication Details
Publication Date
1994-12-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest