Effect of Atomoxetine Treatment on Reading and Phonological Skills in Children with Dyslexia or Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Comorbid Dyslexia in a Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Влияние лечения атомоксетином на навыки чтения и фонологические навыки у детей с дислексией или синдромом дефицита внимания с гиперактивностью и сопутствующей дислексией: рандомизированное плацебо-контролируемое исследование
Sally E. Shaywitz, Bennett A. Shaywitz, Linda Wietecha, Sharon B. Wigal, Keith McBurnett, David W. Williams, William G. Kronenberger, Stephen R. Hooper
2016-07-13

Atomoxetine treatmentAttention-deficit/hyperactivity disorderDevelopmental dyslexiaPhonological processingRandomized placebo-controlled trial
OBJECTIVES: Evaluated the effects of atomoxetine on the reading abilities of children with dyslexia only or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and comorbid dyslexia. METHODS: Children aged 10-16 years (N = 209) met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria for dyslexia only (n = 58), ADHD and comorbid dyslexia (n = 124), or ADHD only (n = 27) and were of normal intelligence. Patients were treated with atomoxetine (1.0-1.4 mg/kg/day) or placebo in a 16-week, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. The dyslexia-only and ADHD and comorbid dyslexia groups were randomized 1:1; the ADHD-only group received atomoxetine in a blinded manner. Reading abilities were measured with the Woodcock Johnson III (WJIII), Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing (CTOPP), Gray Oral Reading Tests-4, and Test of Word Reading Efficiency. RESULTS: Atomoxetine-treated dyslexia-only patients compared with placebo patients had significantly greater improvement (p < 0.02) with moderate to approaching high effect sizes (ES) on WJIII Word Attack (ES = 0.72), Basic Reading Skills (ES = 0.48), and Reading Vocabulary (ES = 0.73). In the atomoxetine-treated ADHD and comorbid dyslexia group, improvement on the CTOPP Elision measure (ES = 0.50) was significantly greater compared with placebo (p < 0.02). Total, inattentive, and hyperactive/impulsive ADHD symptom reductions were significant in the atomoxetine-treated ADHD and comorbid dyslexia group compared with placebo, and from baseline in the ADHD-only group (p ≤ 0.02). ADHD symptom improvements in the ADHD and comorbid dyslexia group were not correlated with improvements in reading. CONCLUSIONS: Atomoxetine treatment improved reading scores in patients with dyslexia only and ADHD and comorbid dyslexia. Improvements for patients with dyslexia only were in critical components of reading, including decoding and reading vocabulary. For patients with ADHD and comorbid dyslexia, improvements in reading scores were distinct from improvement in ADHD inattention symptoms alone. These data represent the first report of improvements in reading measures following pharmacotherapy treatment in patients with dyslexia only evaluated in a randomized, double-blind trial.
1
ADHD symptom improvement in the comorbid group was not correlated with reading improvement, suggesting partially independent treatment effects.
2
Among children with ADHD and comorbid dyslexia, atomoxetine significantly improved phonological elision compared with placebo.
3
Atomoxetine significantly reduced total, inattentive, and hyperactive/impulsive ADHD symptoms in participants with ADHD and comorbid dyslexia.
4
Dyslexia-only participants receiving atomoxetine showed significantly greater gains than placebo in Word Attack, Basic Reading Skills, and Reading Vocabulary.
5
In a 16-week randomized, placebo-controlled trial, atomoxetine improved critical reading skills in children with dyslexia alone.

Children aged 10–16 years with dyslexia only or ADHD with comorbid dyslexia

Effects of atomoxetine treatment on reading abilities, phonological processing, and ADHD symptoms

Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-07-13
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Sally E. Shaywitz
Bennett A. Shaywitz
Linda Wietecha
Sharon B. Wigal
Keith McBurnett
David W. Williams
William G. Kronenberger
Stephen R. Hooper
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%