Understanding the role of emotion in decision making process: using machine learning to analyze physiological responses to visual, auditory, and combined stimulation
Понимание роли эмоций в процессе принятия решений: использование машинного обучения для анализа физиологических реакций на визуальную, аудиальную и комбинированную стимуляцию
2024-01-07
SCID: 54.1/2h9y47uu
Discuss with AI
cardio-respiratory couplingelectroencephalogram (EEG)emotional stimulation modalities (visual, auditory, combined)galvanic skin response (GSR)physiological responses
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Emotions significantly shape decision-making, and targeted emotional elicitations represent an important factor in neuromarketing, where they impact advertising effectiveness by capturing potential customers' attention intricately associated with emotional triggers. Analyzing biometric parameters after stimulus exposure may help in understanding emotional states. This study investigates autonomic and central nervous system responses to emotional stimuli, including images, auditory cues, and their combination while recording physiological signals, namely the electrocardiogram, blood volume pulse, galvanic skin response, pupillometry, respiration, and the electroencephalogram. The primary goal of the proposed analysis is to compare emotional stimulation methods and to identify the most effective approach for distinct physiological patterns. A novel feature selection technique is applied to further optimize the separation of four emotional states. Basic machine learning approaches are used in order to discern emotions as elicited by different kinds of stimulation. Electroencephalographic signals, Galvanic skin response and cardio-respiratory coupling-derived features provided the most significant features in distinguishing the four emotional states. Further findings highlight how auditory stimuli play a crucial role in creating distinct physiological patterns that enhance classification within a four-class problem. When combining all three types of stimulation, a validation accuracy of 49% was achieved. The sound-only and the image-only phases resulted in 52% and 44% accuracy respectively, whereas the combined stimulation of images and sounds led to 51% accuracy. Isolated visual stimuli yield less distinct patterns, necessitating more signals for relatively inferior performance compared to other types of stimuli. This surprising significance arises from limited auditory exploration in emotional recognition literature, particularly contrasted with the pleathora of studies performed using visual stimulation. In marketing, auditory components might hold a more relevant potential to significantly influence consumer choices.
Key Findings
1
Auditory stimuli produced more distinct physiological patterns that improved emotion classification compared to visual stimuli.
2
EEG, galvanic skin response (GSR), and cardio-respiratory coupling-derived features were the most significant for distinguishing four emotional states.
3
Isolated visual stimuli yielded less distinct patterns and required more signals, resulting in relatively inferior classification performance.
4
Sound-only stimulation achieved 52% accuracy, image-only 44% accuracy, and combined images+sounds 51% accuracy.
5
Validation accuracy for classifying four emotional states was 49% when combining visual, auditory, and combined stimulation features.
Research Object
Human autonomic and central nervous system physiological responses (ECG, BVP, GSR, pupillometry, respiration, EEG) to visual, auditory, and combined emotional stimulation
Research Subject
Differentiation and classification of four emotional states using machine-learning feature selection and basic classifiers to compare effectiveness of image-only, sound-only, and combined stimulation based on distinctive physiological pattern features
Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-01-07
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
16
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest