Understanding the role of emotion in decision making process: using machine learning to analyze physiological responses to visual, auditory, and combined stimulation

Понимание роли эмоций в процессе принятия решений: использование машинного обучения для анализа физиологических реакций на визуальную, аудиальную и комбинированную стимуляцию
Luca Mainardi, Riccardo Barbieri, Edoardo Maria Polo, Andrea Farabbi, Maximiliano Mollura
2024-01-07

cardio-respiratory couplingelectroencephalogram (EEG)emotional stimulation modalities (visual, auditory, combined)galvanic skin response (GSR)physiological responses
Emotions significantly shape decision-making, and targeted emotional elicitations represent an important factor in neuromarketing, where they impact advertising effectiveness by capturing potential customers' attention intricately associated with emotional triggers. Analyzing biometric parameters after stimulus exposure may help in understanding emotional states. This study investigates autonomic and central nervous system responses to emotional stimuli, including images, auditory cues, and their combination while recording physiological signals, namely the electrocardiogram, blood volume pulse, galvanic skin response, pupillometry, respiration, and the electroencephalogram. The primary goal of the proposed analysis is to compare emotional stimulation methods and to identify the most effective approach for distinct physiological patterns. A novel feature selection technique is applied to further optimize the separation of four emotional states. Basic machine learning approaches are used in order to discern emotions as elicited by different kinds of stimulation. Electroencephalographic signals, Galvanic skin response and cardio-respiratory coupling-derived features provided the most significant features in distinguishing the four emotional states. Further findings highlight how auditory stimuli play a crucial role in creating distinct physiological patterns that enhance classification within a four-class problem. When combining all three types of stimulation, a validation accuracy of 49% was achieved. The sound-only and the image-only phases resulted in 52% and 44% accuracy respectively, whereas the combined stimulation of images and sounds led to 51% accuracy. Isolated visual stimuli yield less distinct patterns, necessitating more signals for relatively inferior performance compared to other types of stimuli. This surprising significance arises from limited auditory exploration in emotional recognition literature, particularly contrasted with the pleathora of studies performed using visual stimulation. In marketing, auditory components might hold a more relevant potential to significantly influence consumer choices.
1
Auditory stimuli produced more distinct physiological patterns that improved emotion classification compared to visual stimuli.
2
EEG, galvanic skin response (GSR), and cardio-respiratory coupling-derived features were the most significant for distinguishing four emotional states.
3
Isolated visual stimuli yielded less distinct patterns and required more signals, resulting in relatively inferior classification performance.
4
Sound-only stimulation achieved 52% accuracy, image-only 44% accuracy, and combined images+sounds 51% accuracy.
5
Validation accuracy for classifying four emotional states was 49% when combining visual, auditory, and combined stimulation features.

Human autonomic and central nervous system physiological responses (ECG, BVP, GSR, pupillometry, respiration, EEG) to visual, auditory, and combined emotional stimulation

Differentiation and classification of four emotional states using machine-learning feature selection and basic classifiers to compare effectiveness of image-only, sound-only, and combined stimulation based on distinctive physiological pattern features

Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-01-07
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
16
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Luca Mainardi
Riccardo Barbieri
Edoardo Maria Polo
Andrea Farabbi
Maximiliano Mollura
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%