Fuel consumption and CO 2 emissions from passenger cars in Europe – Laboratory versus real-world emissions
Расход топлива и выбросы CO₂ легковыми автомобилями в Европе — лабораторные и реальные выбросы
2017-02-21
SCID: 54.1/2k8xqk4b
Discuss with AI
CO2 emissionsfuel consumptionlaboratory testingpassenger carsreal-world emissions
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Official laboratory-measured monitoring data indicate a progressive decline in the average fuel consumption and CO 2 emissions of the European passenger car fleet. There is increasing evidence to suggest that officially reported CO 2 values do not reflect the actual performance of the vehicles on the road. A reported difference of 30–40% between official values and real-world estimates was found which has been continuously increasing. This paper reviews the influence of different factors that affect fuel consumption and CO 2 emissions on the road and in the laboratory. Factors such as driving behaviour, vehicle configuration and traffic conditions are reconfirmed as highly influential. Neglected factors (e.g. side winds, rain, road grade), which may have significant contributions in fuel consumption in real world driving are identified. The margins of the present certification procedure contribute between 10 and 20% in the gap between the reported values and reality. The latter was estimated to be of the order of 40%, or 47.5 gCO 2 /km for 2015 average fleet emissions, but could range up to 60% or down to 19% depending on prevailing traffic conditions. The introduction of a new test protocol is expected to bridge about half of the present divergence between laboratory and real world. Finally, substantial literature was found on the topic; however, the lack of common test procedures, analysis tools, and coordinated activity across different countries point out the need for additional research in order to support targeted actions for real world CO 2 reduction. Quality checks of the CO 2 certification procedure, and the reported values, combined with in-use consumption monitoring could be used to assess the gap on a continuous basis.
Key Findings
1
Certification-procedure margins account for 10–20% of the laboratory–real-world gap; the 2015 fleet gap was estimated at about 40%, or 47.5 gCO₂/km.
2
Continuous quality checks and in-use fuel-consumption monitoring are recommended, alongside harmonized procedures and coordinated international research.
3
Driving behaviour, vehicle configuration, and traffic conditions strongly influence on-road fuel consumption and CO₂ emissions.
4
Official laboratory values increasingly underestimate real-world fuel consumption and CO₂ emissions, with reported gaps reaching 30–40%.
5
Side winds, rain, and road grade are identified as often-neglected factors that can substantially increase real-world fuel consumption.
6
The divergence may range from 19% to 60% depending on traffic conditions, while a new test protocol is expected to reduce approximately half of the current gap.
Research Object
European passenger cars and their fleet fuel consumption and CO2 emissions
Research Subject
The divergence between laboratory-certified and real-world fuel consumption and CO2 emissions, including its magnitude and influencing factors
Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-02-21
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest