Green pharmacy at the tips of your toes: medicinal plants used by Setos and Russians of Pechorsky District, Pskov Oblast (NW Russia)
Зелёная аптека у вас под ногами: лекарственные растения, используемые сету и русскими Печорского района Псковской области (Северо-Западная Россия)
2022-06-17
SCID: 54.1/2q2337gr
Discuss with AI
Jaccard Similarity IndexSetosethnomedicinelocal ecological knowledgemedicinal plants
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
BACKGROUND: While the hybridization of ecological knowledge has attracted substantial attention from researchers, the coexistence of local and allopathic medicinal traditions in literate societies widely exposed to centralized schooling and medical services has not yet been investigated. To this end, we studied the current and remembered local ethnomedical practices of Setos and neighboring Russians at the border with Estonia. METHODS: During 2018-2019, we carried out 62 semi-structured interviews in the Pechorsky District of Pskov Oblast, NW Russia. For cross-border comparison, we utilized the data from 71 interviews carried out at the same time among Setos in Estonia. The Jaccard Similarity Index and qualitative comparison were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: The study participants mentioned 819 uses of 112 taxa belonging to 54 families. More than two-thirds of the uses (565) were quoted by 36 Russian interviewees, while the remaining third (254) were quoted by 26 Seto interviewees, with the top 3 in both groups being Viburnum opulus, Rubus idaeus, and Plantago major. The Seto intraethnic similarity index was lower (0.43) than the interethnic similarity in Estonia (0.52) and comparable to the interethnic similarity in Russia (0.43). Setos in Russia and local Russians rely more on wild plants (86% and 80% of medicinal plants, respectively), while Setos in Estonia and Estonians show less preference to them (63% and 61%, respectively). Nevertheless, Setos tend to source wild plants available in their gardens (33% of plants for Setos in Estonia and 38% in Russia), while Russians prefer to source them in the wild (38%). CONCLUSIONS: The preference of both groups in Russia for wild plants over cultivated and purchased plants was inspired by the overall plant literacy, access to nature, and one-to-many knowledge transfer favoring wild plants. Setos in Russia reported a narrower and more homogenous set of plants transferred vertically. However, due to atomization and the erosion of horizontal connections, there are singular plant uses among Setos that overlap with the local Russian set of medicinal plants and differ qualitatively from that of Setos in Estonia.
Key Findings
1
Russian Setos reported a narrower, more homogeneous plant repertoire transferred vertically, while overall plant literacy, access to nature, and one-to-many knowledge transfer favored wild-plant use.
2
Russian participants reported 565 plant uses, while Seto participants reported 254; Viburnum opulus, Rubus idaeus, and Plantago major ranked among the top three for both groups.
3
Seto intraethnic similarity in medicinal plant knowledge was 0.43, lower than interethnic similarity in Estonia (0.52) and equal to that in Russia (0.43).
4
The study documented 819 medicinal plant uses involving 112 taxa from 54 families among Setos and Russians in northwestern Russia.
5
Wild plants constituted 86% of medicinal plants used by Russian Setos and 80% among local Russians, compared with 63% among Setos and 61% among Estonians in Estonia.
Research Object
Current and remembered ethnomedical practices involving medicinal plants among Setos and neighboring Russians in Pechorsky District, Pskov Oblast, NW Russia
Research Subject
The diversity, interethnic and intraethnic similarity, and wild-versus-cultivated sourcing of medicinal-plant uses and knowledge transmission
Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-06-17
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
5
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest