Achieving carbon neutrality in post COP26 in BRICS, MINT, and G7 economies: The role of financial development and governance indicators
Достижение углеродной нейтральности в пост-COP26 периоде в экономиках БРИКС, MINT и G7: роль показателей финансового развития и государственного управления
2023-01-03
SCID: 54.1/2qcdqpkj
Discuss with AI
carbon emissionscarbon neutralityfinancial developmentgood governancerenewable energy
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Pledges and commitments from governments of wealthy nations were made at the COP26 Glasgow summit, thereby rejuvenating hope among nations to confront the climate change challenge. Thus, the study examines the complementarity of financial development and carbon emissions, while accounting for the conditional influence of good governance under three disaggregated indicators – economic, institutional, and political governance for the BRICS, MINT, and the G7 economies. First, the study reveals that financial development depending on the adopted indicator has mixed effects on environmental pollution levels. Specifically, financial development triggers the highest pollution effect via domestic credit to the private sector compared to foreign direct investments, while financial development index reduces environmental pollution. Secondly, economic governance promotes environmental quality by reducing environmental pollution through quality regulation. Third, institutional governance through weaker rule of laws induces pollution, while the control of corruption antagonizes pollution levels. Furthermore, only the voice of accountability supports the pollution-mitigating effect of political governance. On a bloc-to-bloc comparative analysis, governance effectiveness promotes environmental pollution in all the three economic blocs albeit at different magnitudes while the voice of accountability exerts a significant desirable impact on pollution only in the G7 countries. Lastly, renewable energy and trade liberalization exerts a negative and positive influence on environmental degradation respectively.
Key Findings
1
Among political-governance indicators, only voice and accountability significantly supports pollution mitigation; its beneficial effect is observed comparatively in G7 countries.
2
Economic governance improves environmental quality by reducing pollution through stronger regulatory quality.
3
Financial development has mixed environmental effects: domestic credit to the private sector increases pollution most strongly, whereas the financial development index reduces pollution.
4
Governance effectiveness increases pollution across BRICS, MINT, and G7 economies, while renewable energy reduces and trade liberalization increases environmental degradation.
5
Institutional governance produces contrasting effects: weaker rule of law increases pollution, while corruption control reduces it.
Research Object
Environmental pollution and carbon emissions in the BRICS, MINT, and G7 economies
Research Subject
The effects of financial development and economic, institutional, and political governance indicators on environmental pollution, including their interactions and the roles of renewable energy and trade liberalization
Publication Details
Publication Date
2023-01-03
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
180
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest