Machine learning and dyslexia: Classification of individual structural neuro-imaging scans of students with and without dyslexia

Машинное обучение и дислексия: классификация индивидуальных структурных нейровизуализационных сканов студентов с дислексией и без нее
Peter Tamboer, Harrie C. M. Vorst, S. Ghebreab, H. Steven Scholte
2016-01-01

dyslexia classificationgray matteroccipital fusiform gyrusstructural neuroimagingsupport vector machine
Meta-analytic studies suggest that dyslexia is characterized by subtle and spatially distributed variations in brain anatomy, although many variations failed to be significant after corrections of multiple comparisons. To circumvent issues of significance which are characteristic for conventional analysis techniques, and to provide predictive value, we applied a machine learning technique--support vector machine--to differentiate between subjects with and without dyslexia. In a sample of 22 students with dyslexia (20 women) and 27 students without dyslexia (25 women) (18-21 years), a classification performance of 80% (p < 0.001; d-prime = 1.67) was achieved on the basis of differences in gray matter (sensitivity 82%, specificity 78%). The voxels that were most reliable for classification were found in the left occipital fusiform gyrus (LOFG), in the right occipital fusiform gyrus (ROFG), and in the left inferior parietal lobule (LIPL). Additionally, we found that classification certainty (e.g. the percentage of times a subject was correctly classified) correlated with severity of dyslexia (r = 0.47). Furthermore, various significant correlations were found between the three anatomical regions and behavioural measures of spelling, phonology and whole-word-reading. No correlations were found with behavioural measures of short-term memory and visual/attentional confusion. These data indicate that the LOFG, ROFG and the LIPL are neuro-endophenotype and potentially biomarkers for types of dyslexia related to reading, spelling and phonology. In a second and independent sample of 876 young adults of a general population, the trained classifier of the first sample was tested, resulting in a classification performance of 59% (p = 0.07; d-prime = 0.65). This decline in classification performance resulted from a large percentage of false alarms. This study provided support for the use of machine learning in anatomical brain imaging.
1
A support vector machine classified students with and without dyslexia from individual gray-matter scans with 80% accuracy, 82% sensitivity, and 78% specificity.
2
Anatomical measures in the three key regions correlated with spelling, phonology, and whole-word reading, but not short-term memory or visual/attentional confusion.
3
Classification certainty correlated with dyslexia severity (r = 0.47), indicating that anatomical patterns captured clinically relevant variation.
4
The most reliable classification regions were the left and right occipital fusiform gyri and the left inferior parietal lobule.
5
When tested on an independent general-population sample of 876 young adults, performance declined to 59% (p = 0.07) because of many false alarms.

Individual structural brain MRI scans and gray-matter anatomy of university-age students with and without dyslexia

Machine-learning classification of dyslexia based on spatially distributed gray-matter differences, their anatomical localization, and relationships with reading-, spelling-, and phonology-related performance

Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Peter Tamboer
Harrie C. M. Vorst
S. Ghebreab
H. Steven Scholte
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%