Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Cryptococcal Disease: 2010 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America

Клинические протоколы ведения криптококковой инфекции: обновление 2010 г. Общества инфекционных заболеваний Америки
Peter G. Pappas, Thomas S. Harrison, John R. Perfect, Jack D. Sobel, Françoise Dromer, William G. Powderly, William E. Dismukes, David L. Goldman, John R. Graybill, Richard J. Hamill, Robert A. Larsen, Olivier Lortholary, Minh-Hong Nguyen, Nina Singh, Tania C. Sorrell
2010-01-04

Cryptococcal disease management guidelinesCryptococcal meningoencephalitisHIV-associated cryptococcosisImmune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS)Induction therapy with amphotericin B and flucytosine
Cryptococcosis is a global invasive mycosis associated with significant morbidity and mortality. These guidelines for its management have been built on the previous Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines from 2000 and include new sections. There is a discussion of the management of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis in 3 risk groups: (1) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals, (2) organ transplant recipients, and (3) non-HIV-infected and nontransplant hosts. There are specific recommendations for other unique risk populations, such as children, pregnant women, persons in resource-limited environments, and those with Cryptococcus gattii infection. Recommendations for management also include other sites of infection, including strategies for pulmonary cryptococcosis. Emphasis has been placed on potential complications in management of cryptococcal infection, including increased intracranial pressure, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS), drug resistance, and cryptococcomas. Three key management principles have been articulated: (1) induction therapy for meningoencephalitis using fungicidal regimens, such as a polyene and flucytosine, followed by suppressive regimens using fluconazole; (2) importance of early recognition and treatment of increased intracranial pressure and/or IRIS; and (3) the use of lipid formulations of amphotericin B regimens in patients with renal impairment. Cryptococcosis remains a challenging management issue, with little new drug development or recent definitive studies. However, if the diagnosis is made early, if clinicians adhere to the basic principles of these guidelines, and if the underlying disease is controlled, then cryptococcosis can be managed successfully in the vast majority of patients.
1
Despite limited new drug development and definitive studies, early diagnosis, guideline adherence, and control of underlying disease enable successful management in the majority of patients.
2
Guidance includes management for special populations (children, pregnant women, resource-limited settings) and other infection sites such as pulmonary cryptococcosis and cryptococcomas.
3
Guidelines update clinical management of cryptococcosis from the 2000 IDSA recommendations, adding new sections and risk-group-specific guidance.
4
Management of cryptococcal meningoencephalitis is stratified into three risk groups: HIV-infected, organ transplant recipients, and non-HIV/nontransplant hosts.
5
Three key principles: use fungicidal induction regimens (e.g., polyene plus flucytosine) followed by fluconazole suppression; early recognition/treatment of increased intracranial pressure and IRIS; use lipid amphotericin B formulations for renal impairment.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of cryptococcal disease

Recommendations and management principles for diagnosis, risk-group–specific treatment (including induction and maintenance antifungal regimens), management of complications (increased intracranial pressure, IRIS, cryptococcomas, drug resistance), and special populations/sites (HIV-infected, transplant recipients, non-HIV/non-transplant hosts, children, pregnant women, resource-limited settings, pulmonary and C. gattii infections)

Publication Details
Publication Date
2010-01-04
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Peter G. Pappas
Thomas S. Harrison
John R. Perfect
Jack D. Sobel
Françoise Dromer
William G. Powderly
William E. Dismukes
David L. Goldman
John R. Graybill
Richard J. Hamill
Robert A. Larsen
Olivier Lortholary
Minh-Hong Nguyen
Nina Singh
Tania C. Sorrell
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%