Accommodating Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Indonesia: From Immigration Detention to Containment in “Alternatives to Detention”
Размещение лиц, ищущих убежища, и беженцев в Индонезии: от иммиграционного содержания под стражей к ограничению передвижения в рамках «альтернатив содержанию под стражей»
2017-11-03
SCID: 54.1/2vgt3xmw
Discuss with AI
Indonesiaalternatives to detentionasylum seekers and refugeescontainmentimmigration detention
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Considered the last ‘stepping stone’ before Australia, Indonesia plays an important role in immobilising secondary movements of asylum seekers and refugees in Southeast Asia. While migration scholarship has dedicated substantial attention to immigration detention and the deplorable living conditions inside immigration detention centres (IDCs), this article explores “alternatives to detention” (ATD) in two Indonesian localities: the city of Makassar and the province of Aceh. Seeking to contribute to a critical examination of ATD more generally, this article examines individual freedom, mobility, mechanisms of care and aid provision, protection of rights, self-determination, and matters of personal safety. The article illustrates the remaining limitations and the lack of rights that asylum seekers and refugees in Indonesia continue to face outside of IDCs. A durable solution, in the form of integration, is not available to asylum seekers and refugees, as they are prevented from integrating into the local host societies, and their social and economic mobility remains widely restricted. Yet at the same time, despite more physical mobility in ATD, asylum seekers and refugees remain contained within Indonesia as their onward movement remains deterred as well.
Key Findings
1
ATD arrangements in Indonesia retain significant limitations in care and aid provision, leaving asylum seekers and refugees without adequate rights outside detention centres.
2
Although ATD reduces physical confinement, it still deters onward movement and functions as a mechanism for immobilising secondary migration toward Australia.
3
Asylum seekers and refugees in Makassar and Aceh face persistent restrictions on individual freedom, social and economic mobility, rights protection, self-determination, and safety.
4
Indonesia’s “alternatives to detention” provide greater physical mobility than immigration detention centres but continue to contain asylum seekers and refugees within the country.
5
Integration is unavailable as a durable solution because asylum seekers and refugees are prevented from integrating into local host societies.
Research Object
Asylum seekers and refugees in Indonesia under “alternatives to detention” in Makassar and Aceh
Research Subject
Individual freedom and mobility, care and aid provision, rights protection, self-determination, personal safety, and ongoing containment of asylum seekers and refugees under alternatives to detention
Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-11-03
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest