The Effectiveness of the Problem-Based Learning Teaching Model for Use in Introductory Chinese Undergraduate Medical Courses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Эффективность модели обучения на основе проблемно-ориентированного обучения в вводных курсах медицинской подготовки китайских студентов бакалавриата: систематический обзор и метаанализ
Yanqi Zhang, Liang Zhou, Xiaoyu Liu, Ling Liu, Yazhou Wu, Zengwei Zhao, Dali Yi, Dong Kee Yi, Dong Yi
2015-03-30

course examination outcomeslecture-based learningproblem-based learningsystematic review and meta-analysisundergraduate medical education
BACKGROUND: Although the problem-based learning (PBL) emerged in 1969 and was soon widely applied internationally, the rapid development in China only occurred in the last 10 years. This study aims to compare the effect of PBL and lecture-based learning (LBL) on student course examination results for introductory Chinese undergraduate medical courses. METHODS: Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trial studies on PBL use in Chinese undergraduate medical education were retrieved through PubMed, the Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and VIP China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP-CSTJ) with publication dates from 1st January 1966 till 31 August 2014. The pass rate, excellence rate and examination scores of course examination were collected. Methodological quality was evaluated based on the modified Jadad scale. The I-square statistic and Chi-square test of heterogeneity were used to assess the statistical heterogeneity. Overall RRs or SMDs with their 95% CIs were calculated in meta-analysis. Meta-regression and subgroup meta-analyses were also performed based on comparators and other confounding factors. Funnel plots and Egger's tests were performed to assess degrees of publication bias. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included 31studies and 4,699 subjects. Fourteen studies were of high quality with modified Jadad scores of 4 to 6, and 17 studies were of low quality with scores of 1 to 3. Relative to the LBL model, the PBL model yielded higher course examination pass rates [RR = 1.09, 95%CI (1.03, 1.17)], excellence rates [RR = 1.66, 95%CI (1.33, 2.06)] and examination scores [SMD = 0.82, 95%CI (0.63, 1.01)]. The meta-regression results show that course type was the significant confounding factor that caused heterogeneity in the examination-score meta-analysis (t = 0.410, P<0.001). The examination score SMD in "laboratory course" subgroup [SMD = 2.01, 95% CI: (1.50, 2.52)] was higher than that in "theory course" subgroup [SMD = 0.72, 95% CI: (0.56, 0.89)]. CONCLUSIONS: PBL teaching model application in introductory undergraduate medical courses can increase course examination excellence rates and scores in Chinese medical education system. It is more effective when applied to laboratory courses than to theory-based courses.
1
A systematic review and meta-analysis included 31 controlled studies involving 4,699 students in Chinese undergraduate medical education.
2
Compared with lecture-based learning, problem-based learning increased course examination pass rates (RR 1.09, 95% CI 1.03–1.17).
3
Course type significantly contributed to heterogeneity in examination-score effects, and the evidence base included both high- and low-quality studies.
4
Problem-based learning improved examination scores overall (SMD 0.82, 95% CI 0.63–1.01), with larger effects in laboratory courses (SMD 2.01, 95% CI 1.50–2.52).
5
Problem-based learning substantially improved examination excellence rates (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.33–2.06) compared with lecture-based learning.

Problem-based learning (PBL) and lecture-based learning (LBL) models in introductory Chinese undergraduate medical courses

Their comparative effects on course examination pass rates, excellence rates, and examination scores

Publication Details
Publication Date
2015-03-30
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Yanqi Zhang
Liang Zhou
Xiaoyu Liu
Ling Liu
Yazhou Wu
Zengwei Zhao
Dali Yi
Dong Kee Yi
Dong Yi
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%