Assessing the toxicity of freshwater sediments
Оценка токсичности пресноводных донных отложений
1991-12-01
SCID: 54.1/2xma6k7z
Discuss with AI
acute and chronic toxicity assaysbioavailable contaminant fractionfreshwater sediment toxicity testsin situ vs laboratory test comparisonssediment toxicology
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Abstract The science of sediment toxicology essentially began in the late 1970s. It was largely a product of dredging concerns and recognition of widespread contamination of sediments. During the past few years, sediment toxicity research activity has increased dramatically. Currently, most tests are of an acute nature with fewer available for determining sublethal endpoints of chronic toxicity. Test systems of single and multiple species have included most levels of biological organization in aquatic ecosystems and have been conducted in the laboratory on whole sediments, interstitial waters, elutriates, or other extractable fractions under a wide variety of conditions. Evaluations of methodological effects and comparisons with in situ toxicity using surrogate test species and indigenous communities have, on occasion, shown significant differences in test responses. These differences may be attributed to laboratory-controlled parameters (e.g., light, species, life stage, exposure conditions, test phase, spiking method); sampling and laboratory-induced disruption of sediment integrity; alteration of toxicant partitioning due to manipulations and temporal effects; and failure to recognize other influencing ecosystem variables (e.g., organism niche and life cycle, sediment partitioning and gradient dynamics, physicochemical and biological process integration, biotic and abiotic disturbances, micro- and macrobiota patches, food-web interactions). Optimizing and standardizing test methods will require further studies of these variables to improve inter-laboratory comparisons and ecosystem validity. Despite the many unknowns that exist, a variety of sediment toxicity tests have been effectively used in assessing toxicant contamination by measuring the bioavailable fraction of the in-place pollutants. The optimal assays vary with the study and its objectives. Intergrative studies using several chemical, community, and toxicity measures are currently the most effective at defining ecosystem perturbations.
Key Findings
1
Available tests include single- and multiple-species systems across biological organization levels, using whole sediments, interstitial waters, elutriates, and extracts.
2
Despite uncertainties, various sediment toxicity tests effectively assess contaminant bioavailable fractions, and optimal assays depend on study objectives.
3
Integrative studies combining chemical, community, and toxicity measures are currently the most effective approach to define ecosystem perturbations.
4
Laboratory tests can differ significantly from in situ toxicity due to controlled parameters, sampling disruption, altered toxicant partitioning, and unrecognized ecosystem variables.
5
Optimizing and standardizing test methods requires further study of methodological, sampling, and ecosystem variables to improve inter-laboratory comparability and ecological validity.
6
Research activity in sediment toxicity has increased dramatically in recent years, but most tests remain acute rather than chronic.
7
Sediment toxicology emerged in the late 1970s driven by dredging concerns and widespread sediment contamination.
Research Object
Freshwater sediments
Research Subject
Toxicity assessment of freshwater sediments, including acute and chronic effects, bioavailable pollutant fractions, methodological influences on test responses, and evaluation of ecological relevance of sediment toxicity tests
Publication Details
Publication Date
1991-12-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest