Treatment of Drug-Induced Liver Injury

Лечение лекарственно-индуцированного поражения печени
Rolf Teschke
2022-12-21

N-acetylcysteineRoussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Methoddrug-induced liver injuryhepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndromeimmune checkpoint inhibitors
Current pharmacotherapy options of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) remain under discussion and are now evaluated in this analysis. Needless to say, the use of the offending drug must be stopped as soon as DILI is suspected. Normal dosed drugs may cause idiosyncratic DILI, and drugs taken in overdose commonly lead to intrinsic DILI. Empirically used but not substantiated regarding efficiency by randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is the intravenous antidote treatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in patients with intrinsic DILI by N-acetyl-p-aminophenol (APAP) overdose. Good data recommending pharmacotherapy in idiosyncratic DILI caused by hundreds of different drugs are lacking. Indeed, a recent analysis revealed that just eight RCTs have been published, and in only two out of eight trials were DILI cases evaluated for causality by the worldwide used Roussel Uclaf Causality Assessment Method (RUCAM), representing overall a significant methodology flaw, as results of DILI RCTs lacking RUCAM are misleading since many DILI cases are known to be attributable erroneously to nondrug alternative causes. In line with these major shortcomings and mostly based on anecdotal reports, glucocorticoids (GCs) and other immuno-suppressants may be given empirically in carefully selected patients with idiosyncratic DILI exhibiting autoimmune features or caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), while some patients with cholestatic DILI may benefit from ursodeoxycholic acid use; in other patients with drug-induced hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (HSOS) and coagulopathy risks, the indication for anticoagulants should be considered. In view of many other mechanistic factors such as the hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 with a generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), ferroptosis with toxicity of intracellular iron, and modification of the gut microbiome, additional therapy options may be available in the future. In summation, stopping the offending drug is still the first line of therapy for most instances of acute DILI, while various therapies are applied empirically and not based on good data from RCTs awaiting further trials using the updated RUCAM that asks for strict exclusion and inclusion details like liver injury criteria and provides valid causality rankings of probable and highly probable grades.
1
Evidence supporting pharmacotherapy for idiosyncratic DILI is weak: only eight randomized trials were identified, and just two used RUCAM for causality assessment.
2
Glucocorticoids or other immunosuppressants may be considered empirically in selected idiosyncratic DILI with autoimmune features or caused by immune checkpoint inhibitors.
3
N-acetylcysteine is empirically used for intrinsic injury after acetaminophen overdose, but its efficacy lacks confirmation from randomized controlled trials.
4
The suspected offending drug should be discontinued immediately, as stopping exposure remains the central intervention for drug-induced liver injury.
5
Ursodeoxycholic acid may benefit some cholestatic cases, while anticoagulation should be considered for hepatic sinusoidal obstruction syndrome with coagulopathy risk; future therapies may target ROS, ferroptosis, and the gut microbiome.

drug-induced liver injury (DILI)

pharmacological treatment options and their evidence, including antidote, immunosuppressive, hepatoprotective, and anticoagulant therapies

Publication Details
Publication Date
2022-12-21
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
41
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Rolf Teschke
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%