Lead-Cooled Fast Reactor Systems and the Fuels and Materials Challenges

Системы быстрых реакторов с свинцовым охлаждением и проблемы топлива и материалов
Todd R. Allen, Douglas C. Crawford
2007-01-01

ferritic/martensitic stainless steelslead-bismuth coolantlead-cooled fast reactornitride fuelsrefractory metal alloys
Anticipated developments in the consumer energy market have led developers of nuclear energy concepts to consider how innovations in energy technology can be adapted to meet consumer needs. Properties of molten lead or lead-bismuth alloy coolants in lead-cooled fast reactor (LFR) systems offer potential advantages for reactors with passive safety characteristics, modular deployment, and fuel cycle flexibility. In addition to realizing those engineering objectives, the feasibility of such systems will rest on development or selection of fuels and materials suitable for use with corrosive lead or lead-bismuth. Three proposed LFR systems, with varying levels of concept maturity, are described to illustrate their associated fuels and materials challenges. Nitride fuels are generally favored for LFR use over metal or oxide fuels due to their compatibility with molten lead and lead-bismuth, in addition to their high atomic density and thermal conductivity. Ferritic/martensitic stainless steels, perhaps with silicon and/or oxide-dispersion additions for enhanced coolant compatibility and improved high-temperature strength, might prove sufficient for low-to-moderate-temperature LFRs, but it appears that ceramics or refractory metal alloys will be necessary for higher-temperature LFR systems intended for production of hydrogen energy carriers.
1
Ceramics or refractory metal alloys appear necessary for higher-temperature LFRs aimed at hydrogen production due to insufficient performance of ferritic/martensitic steels.
2
Feasibility of LFR systems depends critically on developing or selecting fuels and materials compatible with corrosive lead or lead-bismuth.
3
Ferritic/martensitic stainless steels, possibly alloyed with silicon or oxide-dispersion strengthened, may suffice for low-to-moderate-temperature LFRs for improved coolant compatibility and high-temperature strength.
4
Molten lead and lead-bismuth coolants give LFRs potential advantages for passive safety, modular deployment, and fuel cycle flexibility.
5
Nitride fuels are generally favored for LFRs over metal or oxide fuels because of better compatibility with lead/lead-bismuth, higher atomic density, and superior thermal conductivity.
6
Three LFR system concepts with differing maturities illustrate distinct fuels and materials challenges across designs.

Lead-cooled fast reactor (LFR) systems and their candidate fuels and structural materials (including molten lead/lead-bismuth coolant, nitride fuels, ferritic/martensitic steels, ceramics, and refractory metal alloys)

Fuels and materials challenges for LFRs, specifically coolant compatibility, corrosion resistance in molten lead/lead-bismuth, fuel form suitability (favoring nitride fuels), and temperature-dependent material performance requirements for low-to-high-temperature reactors

Publication Details
Publication Date
2007-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Todd R. Allen
Douglas C. Crawford
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%