Routine Cerebral Embolic Protection during Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation
Рутинная церебральная эмболическая защита при трансперсональном имплантации аортального клапана
2025-03-30
SCID: 54.1/3q46cf89
Discuss with AI
72-hour post-TAVI stroke incidenceCerebral embolic protection (CEP)Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI)procedure-related strokerandomized controlled trial
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) is associated with procedure-related stroke. Cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices may reduce embolization to the cerebral circulation and hence the incidence of stroke. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial across 33 centers in the United Kingdom. We randomly assigned 7635 participants with aortic stenosis in a 1:1 ratio to undergo TAVI with a CEP device (CEP group) or TAVI without a CEP device (control group). The primary outcome was stroke within 72 hours after TAVI or before discharge from the hospital (if discharge occurred sooner). RESULTS: A total of 3815 participants were assigned to the CEP group and 3820 to the control group. A primary-outcome event occurred in 81 of 3795 participants (2.1%) in the CEP group and in 82 of 3799 participants (2.2%) in the control group (difference, -0.02 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -0.68 to 0.63; P = 0.94). Disabling stroke occurred in 47 participants (1.2%) in the CEP group and in 53 (1.4%) in the control group. Death occurred in 29 participants (0.8%) in the CEP group and in 26 (0.7%) in the control group. Overall access-site complications appeared to be similar in the two groups (8.1% in the CEP group and 7.7% in the control group). A total of 24 serious adverse events occurred in 22 of 3798 participants (0.6%) in the CEP group, and 13 serious adverse events occurred in 13 of 3803 participants (0.3%) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Among participants undergoing TAVI, routine use of CEP did not decrease the incidence of stroke within 72 hours. (Funded by the British Heart Foundation and Boston Scientific; BHF PROTECT-TAVI ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN16665769.).
Key Findings
1
Disabling stroke rates were similar between groups: 1.2% in the CEP group versus 1.4% in the control group.
2
In a randomized trial of 7635 TAVI patients, routine use of cerebral embolic protection (CEP) did not reduce stroke within 72 hours or before discharge (2.1% CEP vs. 2.2% control; difference -0.02 percentage points; P = 0.94).
3
Mortality within the study period was similar: 0.8% in the CEP group and 0.7% in the control group.
4
Overall access-site complication rates were similar between groups (8.1% CEP vs. 7.7% control).
5
Serious adverse events were more frequent numerically in the CEP group (24 events in 22 participants, 0.6%) than in the control group (13 events in 13 participants, 0.3%).
Research Object
Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) procedures with versus without routine cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices
Research Subject
Effect of routine cerebral embolic protection on incidence of peri-procedural stroke (within 72 hours or before discharge) and related clinical outcomes following TAVI
Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-03-30
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
89
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest