Routine Cerebral Embolic Protection during Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation

Рутинная церебральная эмболическая защита при трансперсональном имплантации аортального клапана
Matthew C. Dodd, Tim Clayton, Andreas Baumbach, Simon Redwood, Nick Curzen, Rajesh Kharbanda, Adrian Banning, Peter Ludman, Rod Stables, Daniel J. Blackman, Robert Henderson, Colum Owens, Bernard Prendergast, Saqib Chowdhary, Clare Appleby, James Cotton, Muhiddin Ozkor, Iqbal Malik, David Hildick‐Smith, Stephen Palmer, Rajesh Aggarwal, James Kennedy, Zahra Jamal, Richard Evans, Kiran Bal, Alexander Perkins, Jonathan Byrne, Rajiv Das, Sagar N. Doshi, Stuart Watkins, Douglas Muir, Richard Anderson, Richard Varcoe, Stephen Dorman, Sam Firoozi, Raj Chelliah, Javaid Iqbal, Karim Ratib, Ciprian Dospinescu, Venkatesan Suresh, Nicholas Cruden, Thirumaran Rajathurai, Andrew Wiper, Charis Costopoulos, Ayush Khurana, Amerjeet Banning
2025-03-30

72-hour post-TAVI stroke incidenceCerebral embolic protection (CEP)Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI)procedure-related strokerandomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) is associated with procedure-related stroke. Cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices may reduce embolization to the cerebral circulation and hence the incidence of stroke. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial across 33 centers in the United Kingdom. We randomly assigned 7635 participants with aortic stenosis in a 1:1 ratio to undergo TAVI with a CEP device (CEP group) or TAVI without a CEP device (control group). The primary outcome was stroke within 72 hours after TAVI or before discharge from the hospital (if discharge occurred sooner). RESULTS: A total of 3815 participants were assigned to the CEP group and 3820 to the control group. A primary-outcome event occurred in 81 of 3795 participants (2.1%) in the CEP group and in 82 of 3799 participants (2.2%) in the control group (difference, -0.02 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -0.68 to 0.63; P = 0.94). Disabling stroke occurred in 47 participants (1.2%) in the CEP group and in 53 (1.4%) in the control group. Death occurred in 29 participants (0.8%) in the CEP group and in 26 (0.7%) in the control group. Overall access-site complications appeared to be similar in the two groups (8.1% in the CEP group and 7.7% in the control group). A total of 24 serious adverse events occurred in 22 of 3798 participants (0.6%) in the CEP group, and 13 serious adverse events occurred in 13 of 3803 participants (0.3%) in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Among participants undergoing TAVI, routine use of CEP did not decrease the incidence of stroke within 72 hours. (Funded by the British Heart Foundation and Boston Scientific; BHF PROTECT-TAVI ISRCTN Registry number, ISRCTN16665769.).
1
Disabling stroke rates were similar between groups: 1.2% in the CEP group versus 1.4% in the control group.
2
In a randomized trial of 7635 TAVI patients, routine use of cerebral embolic protection (CEP) did not reduce stroke within 72 hours or before discharge (2.1% CEP vs. 2.2% control; difference -0.02 percentage points; P = 0.94).
3
Mortality within the study period was similar: 0.8% in the CEP group and 0.7% in the control group.
4
Overall access-site complication rates were similar between groups (8.1% CEP vs. 7.7% control).
5
Serious adverse events were more frequent numerically in the CEP group (24 events in 22 participants, 0.6%) than in the control group (13 events in 13 participants, 0.3%).

Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation (TAVI) procedures with versus without routine cerebral embolic protection (CEP) devices

Effect of routine cerebral embolic protection on incidence of peri-procedural stroke (within 72 hours or before discharge) and related clinical outcomes following TAVI

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-03-30
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
89
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Matthew C. Dodd
Tim Clayton
Andreas Baumbach
Simon Redwood
Nick Curzen
Rajesh Kharbanda
Adrian Banning
Peter Ludman
Rod Stables
Daniel J. Blackman
Robert Henderson
Colum Owens
Bernard Prendergast
Saqib Chowdhary
Clare Appleby
James Cotton
Muhiddin Ozkor
Iqbal Malik
David Hildick‐Smith
Stephen Palmer
Rajesh Aggarwal
James Kennedy
Zahra Jamal
Richard Evans
Kiran Bal
Alexander Perkins
Jonathan Byrne
Rajiv Das
Sagar N. Doshi
Stuart Watkins
Douglas Muir
Richard Anderson
Richard Varcoe
Stephen Dorman
Sam Firoozi
Raj Chelliah
Javaid Iqbal
Karim Ratib
Ciprian Dospinescu
Venkatesan Suresh
Nicholas Cruden
Thirumaran Rajathurai
Andrew Wiper
Charis Costopoulos
Ayush Khurana
Amerjeet Banning
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%