The Administrative Law of Global Private-Public Regulation: the Case of Forestry
Административное право глобального частно-государственного регулирования: пример лесного хозяйства
2006-02-01
SCID: 54.1/3qaabysq
Discuss with AI
administrative lawforest certificationglobal forest regulationlearning accountabilityprivate-public regulation
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
An important ensemble of transnational, transgovernmental regulatory institutions has emerged in the forestry sector over the past decade. These ‘forest certification’ programmes set global standards for proper forest management and apply them through institutionalized licensing and inspection programmes. Similar programmes are appearing in other sectors. Developed largely by environmental NGOs and industry associations rather than governments, forest certification programmes are nominally voluntary, but are becoming increasingly mandatory in practice. They are also gradually linking with government regulatory and management programmes in various ways, while remaining in tension both with each other and with government programmes. The overall regulatory system is thus highly dynamic, as the programmes compete with each other for business and also with government regulatory programmes for public acceptance. This paper describes and assesses the administrative law – i.e., the requirements for rule-making and rule application – of the emerging global forest regulatory system. It finds that while the certification programmes are becoming increasingly transparent and participatory, often comparing favourably with government programmes, some of them still need considerable improvement and all of them face serious challenges. It concludes with a discussion of the problem of accountability, outlining the possibility that the programmes exemplify an emerging new kind of ‘learning accountability’.
Key Findings
1
Although nominally voluntary, forest certification is becoming increasingly mandatory in practice and is linking progressively with government regulatory and management programmes.
2
Certification programmes are becoming more transparent and participatory, in some cases comparing favorably with government regulatory programmes, but significant improvements remain necessary.
3
The emerging global forest regulatory system is dynamic and contested, with certification schemes competing among themselves and with government programmes for business and public acceptance.
4
These programmes face serious accountability challenges and may represent an emerging form of “learning accountability.”
5
Transnational forest certification programmes have established global standards for forest management through institutionalized licensing and inspection systems.
Research Object
global forest regulatory system comprising transnational forest certification programmes and their links with government regulation
Research Subject
administrative law requirements, transparency, participation, and accountability of forest certification programmes in rule-making and rule application
Publication Details
Publication Date
2006-02-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest