The use of, and attitudes toward, artificial intelligence in members of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine and the European College of Veterinary Internal Medicine - Companion Animals
Использование искусственного интеллекта и отношение к нему среди членов Американского колледжа ветеринарной внутренней медицины и Европейского колледжа ветеринарной внутренней медицины — домашних животных
2026-01-01
SCID: 54.1/3qvgf2s6
Discuss with AI
AI literacyclinical practicecross-sectional surveymedical scribesveterinary artificial intelligence
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being applied in veterinary medicine, but uptake and knowledge levels have not been widely assessed. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Determine the use of, attitudes toward, and self-reported knowledge of AI among the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ACVIM) and European College of Veterinary Internal Medicine - Companion Animals (ECVIM-CA) members. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey-based study was conducted. Responses were summarized, and descriptive statistics were performed. Survey answers were compared between ACVIM and ECVIM-CA members, and between older and younger respondents, using chi-squared or Wilcoxon rank sum tests. RESULTS: Completed survey responses were analyzed for 301 ACVIM members and 155 ECVIM-CA members. Ninety-seven of 155 (63%) ECVIM-CA and 159/300 (53%) ACVIM respondents reported they were "slightly" or "not at all" knowledgeable regarding AI. Of those surveyed, 126 (42%) ACVIM and 51 (33%) ECVIM-CA members routinely use AI tools in their clinical practice, with AI-enhanced medical scribes reported as the most commonly used AI tool. Of ACVIM and ECVIM-CA respondents, 201/299 (67%) and 103/155 (66%), respectively, agree with the statement "AI tools will become standard of care in veterinary medicine." There were no differences in use or knowledge between ACVIM and ECVIM-CA respondents. Younger respondents used AI tools for personal use more frequently than older respondents (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Many ACVIM and ECVIM-CA members are leveraging AI tools in their practice and agree it will become a routine part of our practice. However, the low knowledge base highlights a need to increase AI literacy in veterinary specialty medicine.
Key Findings
1
AI tools were routinely used in clinical practice by 42% of ACVIM and 33% of ECVIM-CA respondents, with AI-enhanced medical scribes most commonly reported.
2
Among surveyed specialists, 53% of ACVIM and 63% of ECVIM-CA respondents reported being slightly or not at all knowledgeable about artificial intelligence.
3
Approximately two-thirds of respondents in both organizations agreed that AI tools will become standard of care in veterinary medicine.
4
No significant differences were found between ACVIM and ECVIM-CA members in AI use or self-reported knowledge.
5
The reported low AI knowledge base indicates a need to increase AI literacy in veterinary specialty medicine.
6
Younger respondents used AI tools for personal purposes more frequently than older respondents, with a statistically significant difference (P < .0001).
Research Object
Artificial intelligence use among ACVIM and ECVIM-CA veterinary internal medicine members
Research Subject
Use, attitudes, and self-reported knowledge of AI in veterinary clinical practice
Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
2
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest