The Missile Crisis: His Finest Hour Now

Ракетный кризис: теперь — его звездный час
James A. Nathan
1975-01-01

Cuban Missile CrisisU.S.–Soviet détentecrisis managementcrisis negotiationforeign policy process
The Cuban missile crisis has become something of a misleading “model” of the foreign policy process. There are seven central tenets of this model, each of which was considered “confirmed” by the “lessons” of the Cuban crisis: (1) Crises are typical of international relations; (2) Crises are assumed to be manageable; (3) The domestic sector is not especially critical in “crisis management”; (4) Crisis management is the practical ability to reconcile force with negotiation; (5) The process of crisis negotiation is not only manageable but can be “won”; (6) The Soviets seldom negotiate except under duress; (7) Crisis management can and must be a civilian enterprise. After the crisis, there were the beginnings of detente with the Soviet Union. The test-ban treaty, the hot line, and a more civil exchange between the two powers are widely believed to stem from die favorable resolution of the missile crisis. Yet the model and its inherent assumptions on the meaning of Cuba can be challenged. Nevertheless, Cuba stands as a watershed in the cold war and in the history of the international system.
1
Despite these limitations, Cuba remains a watershed in the Cold War and the history of the international system.
2
It frames crisis management as reconciling force with negotiation and assumes that crisis negotiations can be won.
3
The Cuban missile crisis became a misleading model of foreign policy by treating seven contested assumptions as confirmed lessons.
4
The crisis is widely credited with encouraging détente, including the test-ban treaty, the hot line, and more civil U.S.–Soviet relations, yet its favorable interpretation remains challengeable.
5
The model depicts Soviet negotiation as generally requiring duress and crisis management as necessarily a civilian enterprise.
6
The model portrays international crises as typical and manageable while minimizing the domestic sector’s importance in crisis management.

The Cuban missile crisis and its post-crisis foreign-policy consequences

The validity and limitations of the crisis-management model and its assumptions derived from the Cuban missile crisis

Publication Details
Publication Date
1975-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
James A. Nathan
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%