African migration: trends, patterns, drivers

Африканская миграция: тенденции, закономерности и факторы
Marie‐Laurence Flahaux, Hein de Haas
2016-01-22

Dantzig selectorNP-hardnessrestricted eigenvalue conditionsparse regressionℓq sensitivity
Statistical and machine learning theory has developed several conditions ensuring that popular estimators such as the Lasso or the Dantzig selector perform well in high-dimensional sparse regression, including the restricted eigenvalue, compatibility, and [Formula: see text] sensitivity properties. However, some of the central aspects of these conditions are not well understood. For instance, it is unknown if these conditions can be checked efficiently on any given data set. This is problematic, because they are at the core of the theory of sparse regression. Here we provide a rigorous proof that these conditions are NP-hard to check. This shows that the conditions are computationally infeasible to verify, and raises some questions about their practical applications. However, by taking an average-case perspective instead of the worst-case view of NP-hardness, we show that a particular condition, [Formula: see text] sensitivity, has certain desirable properties. This condition is weaker and more general than the others. We show that it holds with high probability in models where the parent population is well behaved, and that it is robust to certain data processing steps. These results are desirable, as they provide guidance about when the condition, and more generally the theory of sparse regression, may be relevant in the analysis of high-dimensional correlated observational data.
1
An average-case analysis shows that ℓq sensitivity holds with high probability when the underlying parent population is well behaved.
2
Restricted eigenvalue, compatibility, and ℓq sensitivity conditions are proven NP-hard to verify on arbitrary datasets.
3
The NP-hardness result demonstrates that directly checking core assumptions underlying Lasso and Dantzig-selector theory is computationally infeasible.
4
The results provide guidance for assessing when sparse-regression theory may apply to high-dimensional correlated observational data despite worst-case verification limits.
5
ℓq sensitivity is weaker and more general than the other studied conditions and remains robust under certain data-processing steps.
Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-01-22
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Marie‐Laurence Flahaux
Hein de Haas
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%