Artificial intelligence and its performance impacts in the oil and gas industry: Challenges, insights, and evaluation approaches

Искусственный интеллект и его влияние на результаты деятельности нефтегазовой отрасли: проблемы, аналитические выводы и подходы к оценке
Sameh Al‐Shihabi, Mohamed Abdalla AlAbdouli
2025-10-11

AI capability measurementAI realizationoil and gas industryoperational, financial, and environmental performancetriangulated evaluation
Oil and gas (O&G) companies are experimenting with artificial intelligence (AI) tools in exploration, production, and trading, but few are able to provide long-term benefits. This thematic review distinguishes basic AI adoption from AI realization—the sustainable ability to embed, scale, and profit from AI through coherent data, skills, and routines. Three research strands are synthesised. First, the literature consistently identifies three driver groups—people, technical, and managerial—that accelerate or hinder realization. Second, progress is usually gauged with three measurement families: text mining of corporate filings, proxy indicators such as AI-related patents or robot density, and survey-based capability indices. Third, realised AI affects three performance domains: operational, financial, and environmental. Within O&G, value chain stage (upstream, midstream, downstream) and ownership model (state-owned and privately owned) modulate both measurement validity and outcome strength. These strands are integrated into a conceptual synthesis that links drivers to gauges and gauges to results, stressing triangulation across indicators to limit bias. Triangulated dashboards linking capability scores to these outcomes expose trade-offs, such as efficiency gains that raise energy use. Recommended actions for practitioners include: connecting operational, financial, and sustainability databases; deploying an annual “AI readiness” survey covering data, talent, and governance; and adopting shared reporting rules that enable cross-company learning. For scholars, the paper highlights measurement gaps, suggests triangulated research designs, and maps boundary conditions needing further study. Together, the insights give executives a firmer basis for allocating AI budgets and give researchers a clearer roadmap toward comparative, evidence-based evaluation of AI value in complex, asset-intensive settings.
1
AI progress is commonly measured through corporate-filing text mining, proxy indicators such as patents or robot density, and survey-based capability indices.
2
AI realization is shaped by three driver groups: people, technical infrastructure, and managerial practices.
3
Realized AI influences operational, financial, and environmental performance, with effects varying by value-chain stage and ownership model.
4
Sustainable AI realization in oil and gas requires embedding, scaling, and monetizing AI through coherent data, skills, and organizational routines.
5
Triangulated dashboards linking AI capabilities to outcomes can reduce measurement bias and reveal trade-offs, including efficiency gains accompanied by higher energy use.

Artificial intelligence adoption and realization in oil and gas companies across exploration, production, and trading

The drivers, measurement approaches, and operational, financial, and environmental performance impacts of sustainable AI realization, including variation by value-chain stage and ownership model

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-10-11
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
2
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Sameh Al‐Shihabi
Mohamed Abdalla AlAbdouli
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat →
Make a presentation
100%