Generative AI in Academia: How Engineering Students Perceive and Approach Ethical Challenges?
Генеративный ИИ в академической среде: как студенты инженерных специальностей воспринимают и решают этические проблемы?
2026-02-09
SCID: 54.1/3u97eg9n
Discuss with AI
academic integritydigital literacyengineering studentsethical guidelinesgenerative artificial intelligence
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Generative artificial intelligence (GAI) technologies have become increasingly prevalent in academic settings, offering students powerful tools for completing academic tasks. From drafting essays to solving complex problems, GAI enhances productivity and creativity, helping students streamline their learning. However, the rapid adoption of these tools raises essential ethical concerns regarding academic integrity, dependency, and the development of critical cognitive skills. This study explores how engineering students perceive and navigate the ethical challenges of GAI use in educational environments. Through a combination of quantitative survey data and qualitative open-ended responses collected via Google Forms, the research investigates students’ awareness of institutional policies, their views on academic honesty, and the implications of GAI for their learning practices. The study reveals a significant gap in students’ understanding of ethical guidelines, with many uncertain about when and how to disclose their use of GAI tools. It highlights the need for more precise institutional policies and for integrating digital literacy programs that address the benefits and risks of GAI use. Furthermore, the study emphasizes the importance of fostering responsible usage by educators and institutions, promoting balanced engagement with GAI tools to enhance learning without compromising the development of critical thinking, creativity, and independent problem-solving skills. The findings suggest that with proper guidance and policy adaptation, GAI can be a valuable resource in academia while preserving the integrity of the educational process.
Key Findings
1
Engineering students widely use generative AI for academic tasks but have significant uncertainty about when and how to disclose its use.
2
Responsible usage promoted by educators and institutions is important to balance GAI-assisted learning with preservation of critical thinking, creativity, and independent problem-solving skills.
3
The study finds a need for more precise institutional policies and integration of digital literacy programs addressing GAI benefits and risks.
4
There is a notable gap in students’ understanding of institutional ethical guidelines concerning generative AI.
5
With proper guidance and adapted policies, generative AI can be a valuable academic resource without compromising educational integrity.
Research Object
Engineering students using generative artificial intelligence (GAI) in educational/academic settings
Research Subject
Perceptions, ethical awareness, and approaches to ethical challenges of GAI use including academic integrity, disclosure practices, dependency, and impacts on learning (critical thinking, creativity, independent problem-solving), plus institutional policy awareness and needs for digital literacy
Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-02-09
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
1
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai13
Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review2022
Students’ voices on generative AI: perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education2023
ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education?2023
Artificial intelligence: A powerful paradigm for scientific research2021
A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research2023
Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education2022
Shaping the Future of Education: Exploring the Potential and Consequences of AI and ChatGPT in Educational Settings2023
Impact of AI assistance on student agency2023
The GenAI is out of the bottle: generative artificial intelligence from a business model innovation perspective2023
Generative AI and Higher Education: Trends, Challenges, and Future Directions from a Systematic Literature Review2024
Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines2019
How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others2019
Thematic Analysis2017