Different Contributions of the Human Amygdala and Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex to Decision-Making
Различный вклад миндалевидного тела и вентромедиальной префронтальной коры человека в принятие решений
1999-07-01
SCID: 54.1/3w6372qm
Discuss with AI
amygdala damagedecision-makingelectrodermal activitysomatic marker hypothesisventromedial prefrontal cortex
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The somatic marker hypothesis proposes that decision-making is a process that depends on emotion. Studies have shown that damage of the ventromedial prefrontal (VMF) cortex precludes the ability to use somatic (emotional) signals that are necessary for guiding decisions in the advantageous direction. However, given the role of the amygdala in emotional processing, we asked whether amygdala damage also would interfere with decision-making. Furthermore, we asked whether there might be a difference between the roles that the amygdala and VMF cortex play in decision-making. To address these two questions, we studied a group of patients with bilateral amygdala, but not VMF, damage and a group of patients with bilateral VMF, but not amygdala, damage. We used the "gambling task" to measure decision-making performance and electrodermal activity (skin conductance responses, SCR) as an index of somatic state activation. All patients, those with amygdala damage as well as those with VMF damage, were (1) impaired on the gambling task and (2) unable to develop anticipatory SCRs while they pondered risky choices. However, VMF patients were able to generate SCRs when they received a reward or a punishment (play money), whereas amygdala patients failed to do so. In a Pavlovian conditioning experiment the VMF patients acquired a conditioned SCR to visual stimuli paired with an aversive loud sound, whereas amygdala patients failed to do so. The results suggest that amygdala damage is associated with impairment in decision-making and that the roles played by the amygdala and VMF in decision-making are different.
Key Findings
1
Bilateral amygdala damage impairs decision-making on the gambling task, as does bilateral ventromedial prefrontal cortex damage.
2
Both amygdala- and VMF-damaged patients failed to develop anticipatory skin conductance responses while considering risky choices.
3
The findings indicate that the amygdala and VMF cortex make distinct contributions to emotional signaling and decision-making.
4
VMF-damaged patients acquired conditioned skin conductance responses to aversive visual cues, but amygdala-damaged patients failed to acquire them.
5
VMF-damaged patients generated skin conductance responses to received rewards and punishments, whereas amygdala-damaged patients did not.
Research Object
Human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal (VMF) cortex (patients with bilateral, focal damage)
Research Subject
Differential contributions of the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to somatic-state signaling and decision-making performance
Publication Details
Publication Date
1999-07-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest