Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence
Деколониальный искусственный интеллект: деколониальная теория как социотехническое предвидение в области искусственного интеллекта
2020-07-12
SCID: 54.1/3zg4z2c8
Discuss with AI
Decolonial AIcolonialitycritical technical practicedecolonial theorysociotechnical foresight
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Abstract This paper explores the important role of critical science, and in particular of post-colonial and decolonial theories, in understanding and shaping the ongoing advances in artificial intelligence. Artificial intelligence (AI) is viewed as amongst the technological advances that will reshape modern societies and their relations. While the design and deployment of systems that continually adapt holds the promise of far-reaching positive change, they simultaneously pose significant risks, especially to already vulnerable peoples. Values and power are central to this discussion. Decolonial theories use historical hindsight to explain patterns of power that shape our intellectual, political, economic, and social world. By embedding a decolonial critical approach within its technical practice, AI communities can develop foresight and tactics that can better align research and technology development with established ethical principles, centring vulnerable peoples who continue to bear the brunt of negative impacts of innovation and scientific progress. We highlight problematic applications that are instances of coloniality, and using a decolonial lens, submit three tactics that can form a decolonial field of artificial intelligence: creating a critical technical practice of AI, seeking reverse tutelage and reverse pedagogies, and the renewal of affective and political communities. The years ahead will usher in a wave of new scientific breakthroughs and technologies driven by AI research, making it incumbent upon AI communities to strengthen the social contract through ethical foresight and the multiplicity of intellectual perspectives available to us, ultimately supporting future technologies that enable greater well-being, with the goal of beneficence and justice for all.
Key Findings
1
AI communities should strengthen the social contract through ethical foresight and diverse intellectual perspectives to promote beneficent and just technologies.
2
AI systems’ adaptive capabilities may enable substantial positive change while posing disproportionate harms to vulnerable populations.
3
Decolonial theory provides sociotechnical foresight for identifying power patterns and risks embedded in artificial intelligence development and deployment.
4
Embedding decolonial critical practice within AI can better align research and technology development with ethical principles and center affected communities.
5
The paper identifies problematic AI applications as instances of coloniality and proposes three tactics: critical technical practice, reverse tutelage and pedagogies, and renewed affective-political communities.
Research Object
Artificial intelligence (AI) as a sociotechnical field and its applications
Research Subject
the sociotechnical power relations, ethical risks, and decolonial foresight strategies shaping AI research and technology development, especially regarding vulnerable peoples
Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-07-12
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest
References available in scid.ai5
Artificial intelligence: a modern approach1995
Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations2019
AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations2018
The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals2020
Fair Inference on Outcomes.2018