Contributions of Leaf Rust Resistance and Awns to Agronomic and Grain Quality Performance in Winter Wheat

Вклад устойчивости к бурой ржавчине и остей в агрономические показатели и качество зерна озимой пшеницы
J. N. Martin, Brett F. Carver, R. M. Hunger, T. S. Cox
2003-09-01

awned wheatgrain yieldleaf rust resistancemilling qualitywinter wheat
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars grown in the Great Plains usually bear awned spikes for their putative value to grain yield and quality. Awnletted cultivars are generally limited to forage‐only systems. We hypothesized that an awnletted type would be more acceptable to grain producers if flag leaf senescence is delayed by protection against leaf rust (caused by Puccinia triticina Erikss.), the principal foliar disease affecting wheat production in the southern Great Plains. In field experiments under moderate levels of leaf rust infection, our objective was to estimate the effects of awns and leaf rust resistance according to the action and interaction of genes controlling these traits. Our analysis focused on agronomic and quality attributes previously shown to be influenced by these genes. Experimental lines were developed from crosses between leaf rust‐susceptible (awnletted or awned) near‐isolines of ‘Century’ and two leaf rust‐resistant, awned backcrossed‐derived lines with Lr41 or Lr42 from Triticum tauschii (Coss.) Schmal. For most attributes, genes controlling awns and rust resistance acted additively but with unequal effects. For the average effects of Lr41 and Lr42, grain yield increased by 63 and 26%, test weight increased by 5 and 3%, and kernel weight increased by 14 and 9%. Averaged across resistant and susceptible types for each gene, awns increased yield by 6.2 and 0%, increased test weight by 1.7% (either Lr gene source), and increased kernel weight by 6 and 4%. Rust resistance was more effective in compensating for the absence of awns than awns were in compensating for the lack of rust resistance. Leaf rust resistance improved milling quality by increasing flour yield and kernel diameter, independent of the presence or absence of awns. The development of awnletted cultivars with acceptable grain yield potential and quality appears achievable, but their utility in a grain‐only production system will be limited without leaf rust resistance.
1
Awns increased yield by 6.2% and 0%, test weight by 1.7%, and kernel weight by 6% and 4%, depending on resistance-gene background.
2
Leaf rust resistance and awns generally exerted additive but unequal effects on agronomic and grain-quality traits in winter wheat.
3
Leaf rust resistance compensated more effectively for awn absence than awns compensated for susceptibility to leaf rust.
4
Leaf rust resistance improved milling quality through higher flour yield and larger kernel diameter regardless of awn status; awnletted grain cultivars therefore require resistance for reliable grain-only production.
5
Lr41 and Lr42 resistance increased grain yield by 63% and 26%, test weight by 5% and 3%, and kernel weight by 14% and 9%, respectively.

Winter wheat cultivars and experimental lines differing in awn expression and leaf rust resistance

The individual and interactive effects of awns and leaf rust resistance on agronomic performance and grain and milling quality

Publication Details
Publication Date
2003-09-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
J. N. Martin
Brett F. Carver
R. M. Hunger
T. S. Cox
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%