Osimertinib in Untreated <i>EGFR</i> -Mutated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Осимертиниб при нелеченном распространённом немелкоклеточном раке лёгкого с мутацией EGFR
Wu‐Chou Su, Jean‐Charles Soria, Siow Ming Lee, Byoung Chul Cho, David Planchard, Yuichiro Ohe, Johan Vansteenkiste, Thanyanan Reungwetwattana, Busyamas Chewaskulyong, Ki Hyeong Lee, Arunee Dechaphunkul, Fumio Imamura, Naoyuki Nogami, Takayasu Kurata, Isamu Okamoto, Caicun Zhou, Ying Cheng, Eun Kyung Cho, Pei Jye Voon, Jhanelle E. Gray, Rachel Hodge, Marcelo Marotti, Yuri Rukazenkov, Suresh S. Ramalingam, Pei Jye Voon
2017-11-18

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitorsEGFR-mutated advanced NSCLCOsimertinibPhase 3 trialProgression-free survival
BACKGROUND: Osimertinib is an oral, third-generation, irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) that selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI-sensitizing and EGFR T790M resistance mutations. We compared osimertinib with standard EGFR-TKIs in patients with previously untreated, EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 556 patients with previously untreated, EGFR mutation-positive (exon 19 deletion or L858R) advanced NSCLC in a 1:1 ratio to receive either osimertinib (at a dose of 80 mg once daily) or a standard EGFR-TKI (gefitinib at a dose of 250 mg once daily or erlotinib at a dose of 150 mg once daily). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival was significantly longer with osimertinib than with standard EGFR-TKIs (18.9 months vs. 10.2 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 0.57; P<0.001). The objective response rate was similar in the two groups: 80% with osimertinib and 76% with standard EGFR-TKIs (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.85 to 1.90; P=0.24). The median duration of response was 17.2 months (95% CI, 13.8 to 22.0) with osimertinib versus 8.5 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 9.8) with standard EGFR-TKIs. Data on overall survival were immature at the interim analysis (25% maturity). The survival rate at 18 months was 83% (95% CI, 78 to 87) with osimertinib and 71% (95% CI, 65 to 76) with standard EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio for death, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.88; P=0.007 [nonsignificant in the interim analysis]). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were less frequent with osimertinib than with standard EGFR-TKIs (34% vs. 45%). CONCLUSIONS: Osimertinib showed efficacy superior to that of standard EGFR-TKIs in the first-line treatment of EGFR mutation-positive advanced NSCLC, with a similar safety profile and lower rates of serious adverse events. (Funded by AstraZeneca; FLAURA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02296125 .).
1
At interim analysis, 18-month survival was higher with osimertinib (83% versus 71%), although overall-survival data were immature and the difference was nonsignificant per the prespecified interim analysis.
2
Grade 3 or higher adverse events were less frequent with osimertinib than with standard EGFR-TKIs (34% versus 45%), supporting superior efficacy with a similar safety profile.
3
In previously untreated EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, osimertinib significantly prolonged median progression-free survival versus standard EGFR-TKIs: 18.9 versus 10.2 months.
4
Objective response rates were similar with osimertinib and standard EGFR-TKIs, but response duration was substantially longer: 17.2 versus 8.5 months.
5
Osimertinib reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 54% compared with standard EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio, 0.46; P<0.001).

Previously untreated, EGFR mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

First-line efficacy, progression-free survival, response duration, overall survival, and safety of osimertinib versus standard EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Publication Details
Publication Date
2017-11-18
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Wu‐Chou Su
Jean‐Charles Soria
Siow Ming Lee
Byoung Chul Cho
David Planchard
Yuichiro Ohe
Johan Vansteenkiste
Thanyanan Reungwetwattana
Busyamas Chewaskulyong
Ki Hyeong Lee
Arunee Dechaphunkul
Fumio Imamura
Naoyuki Nogami
Takayasu Kurata
Isamu Okamoto
Caicun Zhou
Ying Cheng
Eun Kyung Cho
Pei Jye Voon
Jhanelle E. Gray
Rachel Hodge
Marcelo Marotti
Yuri Rukazenkov
Suresh S. Ramalingam
Pei Jye Voon
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%