Global‐scale attribution of anthropogenic and natural dust sources and their emission rates based on MODIS Deep Blue aerosol products

Глобальная атрибуция антропогенных и природных источников пыли и оценка интенсивности их выбросов на основе аэрозольных продуктов MODIS Deep Blue
Thomas E. Gill, Paul Ginoux, N. Christina Hsu, Ming Zhao, Joseph M. Prospero
2012-05-09

MODIS Deep Blue aerosol productsanthropogenic dust emissionsdust source attributionglobal dust cyclenatural dust emissions
Our understanding of the global dust cycle is limited by a dearth of information about dust sources, especially small‐scale features which could account for a large fraction of global emissions. Here we present a global‐scale high‐resolution (0.1°) mapping of sources based on Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Deep Blue estimates of dust optical depth in conjunction with other data sets including land use. We ascribe dust sources to natural and anthropogenic (primarily agricultural) origins, calculate their respective contributions to emissions, and extensively compare these products against literature. Natural dust sources globally account for 75% of emissions; anthropogenic sources account for 25%. North Africa accounts for 55% of global dust emissions with only 8% being anthropogenic, mostly from the Sahel. Elsewhere, anthropogenic dust emissions can be much higher (75% in Australia). Hydrologic dust sources (e.g., ephemeral water bodies) account for 31% worldwide; 15% of them are natural while 85% are anthropogenic. Globally, 20% of emissions are from vegetated surfaces, primarily desert shrublands and agricultural lands. Since anthropogenic dust sources are associated with land use and ephemeral water bodies, both in turn linked to the hydrological cycle, their emissions are affected by climate variability. Such changes in dust emissions can impact climate, air quality, and human health. Improved dust emission estimates will require a better mapping of threshold wind velocities, vegetation dynamics, and surface conditions (soil moisture and land use) especially in the sensitive regions identified here, as well as improved ability to address small‐scale convective processes producing dust via cold pool (haboob) events frequent in monsoon regimes.
1
A global 0.1° resolution dust-source map was developed by combining MODIS Deep Blue dust optical depth with land-use and other datasets.
2
Anthropogenic contributions vary substantially by region, reaching 75% of dust emissions in Australia.
3
Hydrologic sources, including ephemeral water bodies, generate 31% of global emissions; 85% of these emissions are anthropogenic.
4
Improved emission estimates require better characterization of wind thresholds, vegetation dynamics, soil moisture, land use, and small-scale haboob-producing convective processes.
5
Natural sources contribute 75% of global dust emissions, whereas anthropogenic sources contribute 25%.
6
North Africa produces 55% of global dust emissions, with only 8% attributed to anthropogenic sources, mainly in the Sahel.

Global-scale high-resolution map of dust sources and their emission rates derived from MODIS Deep Blue aerosol products

The spatial distribution and relative contributions of natural and anthropogenic dust sources to global dust emission rates

Publication Details
Publication Date
2012-05-09
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Thomas E. Gill
Paul Ginoux
N. Christina Hsu
Ming Zhao
Joseph M. Prospero
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%