The Construction of Human Kinds
Конструирование человеческих типов
2016-08-18
SCID: 54.1/4mzxegrg
Discuss with AI
genderhomosexualitynaturalistic account of social constructionracesocial construction of human kinds
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Abstract Social constructionist explanations of human kinds like race, gender, and homosexuality are commonplace in the social sciences and humanities, but what do they mean and what are their implications? The question is pressing in part because such putative constructs are among the most causally powerful kinds in the social sciences. Mallon’s book synthesizes a naturalistic account of the social construction of human kinds drawing on recent work in evolutionary, cognitive, and social psychology as well as social theory and the philosophy of science. Such a model makes clear that constructionist accounts can be hypotheses to explain causally powerful human kinds. Mallon draws links between the account and broader constructionist concerns with the political and social consequences of our kind representations. In contrast to apparently radical social constructionist approaches associated with debates over the nature of scientific fact, Mallon treats social constructs as the real, sometimes stable products of natural processes, and he suggests that reference to such constructs can figure in our everyday and scientific knowledge of the world. The result is a realistic, naturalistic account of how human representations might make up the world they represent.
Key Findings
1
Contrary to radical constructionism, Mallon argues social constructs are real, sometimes stable products of natural processes and can legitimately feature in everyday and scientific knowledge.
2
Mallon links the naturalistic constructionist account to political and social consequences of how we represent kinds, showing these representations have real effects.
3
Mallon synthesizes a naturalistic account explaining the social construction of human kinds (e.g., race, gender, homosexuality) using evolutionary, cognitive, social psychology, social theory, and philosophy of science.
4
Overall, the book offers a realistic, naturalistic account of how human representations can constitute the world they represent rather than merely misrepresenting it.
5
The proposed model treats constructionist accounts as empirical hypotheses that explain why some human kinds are causally powerful in the social sciences.
Research Object
Human kinds (e.g., race, gender, homosexuality) as socially constructed categories
Research Subject
The social construction processes, causal power, stability, and epistemic/political consequences of human kinds within a naturalistic account drawing on evolutionary, cognitive, and social psychology and social theory
Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-08-18
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest