Veterinary Forensic Pathology

Судебно-ветеринарная патология
Roger W. Byard, Catherine M. Kemper, Mike Bossley, Deborah Kelly, M. O. Hill
2007-11-04

dolphin necropsyforensic histologyveterinary forensic pathologywildlife forensic investigationwound evaluation
Injury assessment of nonhuman subjects may be performed for a variety of reasons, most often in a forensic setting to prove or disprove human activity. In Adelaide, South Australia, the killing of several dolphins from nearby waterways prompted the formation of a multidisciplinary Dolphin Trauma Group, among whose aims was the performance of rapid biological and forensic assessments of dead local dolphins. Necropsy and wound evaluation by group members utilizing standard forensic techniques aimed at determining as quickly as possible causes of death, whether injuries were inflicted ante- or postmortem, whether injuries were responsible for, or had contributed to, the fatal episode, and whether human intervention was responsible for the wounds. Estimation of the type and dimensions of possible weapons was also undertaken, as well as attempts to determine possible time frames for the injuries. This information was then passed on to investigating officers. A series of necropsy findings in seven dolphins investigated by the group (four Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins, one southern right whale dolphin, one short-beaked common dolphin, and one common bottlenose dolphin) is described in this chapter. Two deaths were caused by exsanguination from stabbing/spearing, two to the sequelae of entanglement with fishing gear, one to blunt craniocerebral trauma from a boat propeller injury, one to probable sepsis, and one remained undetermined. All cases had extensive histological assessment of tissues with retention of blood and tissues for future toxicological screening if required. Examination of the brain is undertaken by a neuropathologist when tissues are not putrefied. Blood spots are signed and sealed and transferred to Forensic Science South Australia for storage in case comparisons are subsequently required with blood and tissue on possible weapons. In this way, each dolphin has an extensive forensic evaluation to provide as much usable information to courts and prosecutors if legal proceedings are ever undertaken.The skeletons and life history samples are held in the collections of the South Australian Museum.
1
A multidisciplinary Dolphin Trauma Group conducted rapid forensic necropsies to determine causes of death, injury timing, human involvement, and possible weapons.
2
Among seven investigated dolphins, deaths included two from stabbing or spearing exsanguination, two from fishing-gear entanglement, one from boat-propeller blunt trauma, one from probable sepsis, and one undetermined.
3
Extensive histology, neuropathological brain examination when preservation allowed, and preservation of blood and tissues enabled future toxicological and forensic comparisons.
4
Forensic assessments included wound characterization, estimation of weapon type and dimensions, evaluation of injury timing, and determination of whether injuries caused or contributed to death.
5
The findings were transferred to investigating officers and designed to provide courts with comprehensive biological and forensic evidence.

Dead local dolphins examined through necropsy and forensic wound evaluation

Forensic determination of causes, timing, contributing role, and possible human involvement in injuries and deaths

Publication Details
Publication Date
2007-11-04
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Roger W. Byard
Catherine M. Kemper
Mike Bossley
Deborah Kelly
M. O. Hill
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%