Effect of Surfactant Mixtures on the Evaporation Rate of Aqueous Sessile Droplets from Slightly Hydrophobic Substrates

Влияние смесей поверхностно-активных веществ на скорость испарения водных покоящихся капель со слегка гидрофобных подложек
Kristo Kotsi, Teng Dong, Takeshi Kobayashi, Alexander Moriarty, Ian McRobbie, Alberto Striolo, Panagiota Angeli
2025-09-08

constant contact angleconstant contact radiuscritical micelle concentrationsessile droplet evaporationsurfactant mixtures
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide The evaporation of surfactant-laden sessile droplets has widespread applications in both natural and technological contexts. This study explores the evaporation of droplets containing a nonionic surfactant (tristyrylphenol ethoxylates (EOT)), an anionic surfactant (sodium benzenesulfonate with alkyl chain lengths of C 10 –C 13 (NaDDBS)), and their mixtures at n EOT / n NaDDBS mole ratios of 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 4, deposited on slightly hydrophobic silane-coated glass slides. The surfactants present significantly different critical micelle concentrations. In all cases studied, surfactants decreased the evaporation time compared to that of the pure water droplets. As the initial surfactant concentration increased, the evaporation time decreased. Interestingly, EOT-laden droplets exhibited longer evaporation times, despite EOT decreasing surface tension more than NaDDBS. For the EOT/NaDDBS mixtures, evaporation times fell between those of the surfactants alone, which was attributed to synergistic effects at the interface. The presence of surfactants tends to flatten the droplet, increase the surface area, and disrupt hydrogen bonds at the surface, which are likely to contribute to reducing the evaporation time; on the other hand, surfactant molecules tend to form layers at the surface, which hinder evaporation. The results were interpreted based on two distinct modes of evaporation, i.e., the constant contact radius and the constant contact angle; while both modes of evaporation were observed in all cases, the duration of the constant contact radius mode increased with surfactant concentration. As the concentration increased, deviations were observed between the results and predicted trends.
1
EOT-containing droplets evaporated more slowly than NaDDBS-containing droplets despite EOT producing a greater reduction in surface tension.
2
Increasing the initial surfactant concentration consistently decreased droplet evaporation time, although higher concentrations produced deviations from predicted trends.
3
Mixtures with EOT/NaDDBS mole ratios of 0.01, 0.1, 1, and 4 showed intermediate evaporation times, attributed to synergistic interfacial effects.
4
Nonionic EOT, anionic NaDDBS, and their mixtures all reduced aqueous droplet evaporation time relative to pure water on slightly hydrophobic substrates.
5
Surfactants flattened droplets, increased surface area, and disrupted surface hydrogen bonding, while interfacial surfactant layers could hinder evaporation; both constant-contact-radius and constant-contact-angle modes occurred.

Aqueous sessile droplets containing EOT, NaDDBS, or their mixtures, deposited on slightly hydrophobic silane-coated glass substrates

Evaporation rate and evaporation modes, including the effects of surfactant concentration and EOT/NaDDBS composition on evaporation time, droplet geometry, and interfacial behavior

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-09-08
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
4
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Kristo Kotsi
Teng Dong
Takeshi Kobayashi
Alexander Moriarty
Ian McRobbie
Alberto Striolo
Panagiota Angeli
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%