Treatment Strategies to Control Blood Pressure in People With Hypertension in Tanzania and Lesotho

Стратегии лечения для контроля артериального давления у людей с гипертензией в Танзании и Лесото
Herry Mapesi, Martin Rohacek, Fiona Vanobberghen, Ravi Gupta, Herieth Ismael Wilson, Blaise Lukau, Alain Amstutz, Aza Lyimo, Josephine Muhairwe, Elizabeth Senkoro, Theonestina Byakuzana, Jacqueline Nkouabi, Geofrey Mbunda, Jamali Siru, Ayesha Tarr, Elsie Ramapepe, Madavida Mphunyane, Johanna Oehri, Valeriya Nemtsova, Xiaohan Yan, Moniek Bresser, Tracy R. Glass, Daniel H. Paris, Günther Fink, Winfrid Gingo, Niklaus Daniel Labhardt, Thilo Burkard, Maja Weisser
2025-01-29

blood pressure controlhypertension treatmentlow-dose combination therapyrandomized clinical trialstepped monotherapy
Importance: Hypertension is the primary cardiovascular risk factor in Africa. Recently revised World Health Organization guidelines recommend starting antihypertensive dual therapy; clinical efficacy and tolerability of low-dose triple combination remain unclear. Objectives: To compare the effect of 3 treatment strategies on blood pressure control among persons with untreated hypertension in Africa. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was an open-label, parallel, 3-arm randomized clinical trial to evaluate noninferiority of a strategy starting 2 pills vs full-dose monotherapy with stepped escalation (noninferiority margin 10%) and superiority of starting low-dose 3 pills vs monotherapy allowing for monthly up titration. Recruitment lasted from March 5, 2020, to March 30, 2022. The setting was 2 hospitals in rural Lesotho and Tanzania. Participants included nonpregnant Black African individuals 18 years and older with uncomplicated, untreated hypertension (standardized office blood pressure ≥140 mm Hg systolic or ≥90 mm Hg diastolic). Interventions: Participants were randomized 2:2:1 to stepped monotherapy (amlodipine, 10 mg, with escalation to add hydrochlorothiazide if needed), 2-pill strategy (amlodipine, 5 mg; losartan, 50 mg), or 3-pill strategy (amlodipine, 2.5 mg; losartan, 12.5 mg; hydrochlorothiazide, 6.25 mg). Drugs were up titrated monthly until reaching the target blood pressure (≤ 130/80 mm Hg for participants aged <65 years; ≤140/90 mm Hg for those aged ≥65 years). Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of participants reaching target blood pressure at 12 weeks. Results: Of 1761 participants screened, 1268 were enrolled (median [IQR] age, 54 [45-65] years; 914 female [72%]), with 505 in the monotherapy cohort, 510 in the 2-pill cohort, and 253 in the 3-pill cohort. In noninferiority analyses, 207 of 370 participants (56%) receiving the 2-pill strategy and 173 of 338 participants (51%) receiving the stepped monotherapy strategy achieved the blood pressure target (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.18; 95% CI, 0.87-1.61), fulfilling noninferiority. In superiority analyses after multiple imputation for missing outcome data, 57% of participants receiving the 3-pill strategy, 55% receiving the 2-pill strategy, and 49% receiving the stepped monotherapy strategy reached the target blood pressure (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.94-1.63; P = .12 and aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.91-1.79; P = .16 for the 2-pill and 3-pill vs stepped monotherapy strategies, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this randomized clinical trial show that in 2 African settings, for adults with uncomplicated untreated hypertension, a strategy starting a 2-pill low-dose treatment was noninferior to starting stepped monotherapy. Two-pill and 3-pill low-dose strategies were not superior to stepped monotherapy. Wide CIs preclude the ability to rule out potentially clinically important effects of the additional pill strategies for hypertension control. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04129840.
1
In adults with untreated hypertension in rural Tanzania and Lesotho, starting low-dose two-pill therapy was noninferior to stepped full-dose monotherapy for achieving blood pressure targets at 12 weeks.
2
Low-dose three-pill therapy was not statistically superior to stepped monotherapy, with target attainment of 57% versus 49% after multiple imputation (aOR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.91-1.79; P = .16).
3
Target blood pressure was achieved by 56% with the two-pill strategy versus 51% with stepped monotherapy; adjusted odds ratio was 1.18 (95% CI, 0.87-1.61).
4
The two-pill strategy also showed no statistically significant superiority over monotherapy, despite target attainment of 55% versus 49% (aOR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.94-1.63; P = .12).
5
Wide confidence intervals mean clinically important benefits or harms of initiating additional low-dose pills cannot be excluded.

Adults with uncomplicated untreated hypertension in rural Tanzania and Lesotho

Comparative effectiveness, noninferiority, and tolerability of stepped monotherapy versus low-dose two-pill and three-pill antihypertensive strategies for achieving target blood pressure

Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-01-29
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
10
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Herry Mapesi
Martin Rohacek
Fiona Vanobberghen
Ravi Gupta
Herieth Ismael Wilson
Blaise Lukau
Alain Amstutz
Aza Lyimo
Josephine Muhairwe
Elizabeth Senkoro
Theonestina Byakuzana
Jacqueline Nkouabi
Geofrey Mbunda
Jamali Siru
Ayesha Tarr
Elsie Ramapepe
Madavida Mphunyane
Johanna Oehri
Valeriya Nemtsova
Xiaohan Yan
Moniek Bresser
Tracy R. Glass
Daniel H. Paris
Günther Fink
Winfrid Gingo
Niklaus Daniel Labhardt
Thilo Burkard
Maja Weisser
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%