Impact of Different Low-Volume Concurrent Training Regimens on Cardiometabolic Health, Inflammation, and Fitness in Obese Metabolic Syndrome Patients
Влияние различных программ низкообъёмных параллельных тренировок на кардиометаболическое здоровье, воспаление и физическую подготовленность у пациентов с ожирением и метаболическим синдромом
2025-01-31
SCID: 54.1/4wk3h6hr
Discuss with AI
1-RTCT protocolsLOW-HIITWB-EMScardiometabolic healthfitnessinflammationlow-volume concurrent trainingobese metabolic syndrometailored exercise prescriptions
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Evidence supports the benefits of concurrent training (CT), which combines endurance and resistance exercises, for enhancing health and physical fitness. Recently, low-volume, time-efficient exercise approaches such as low-volume high-intensity interval training (LOW-HIIT), whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS), and single-set resistance training (1-RT) have gained popularity for their feasibility and efficacy in improving various health outcomes. This study investigated the effects of low-volume CT, focusing on (1) whether exercise order affects cardiometabolic health, inflammation, and fitness adaptations and (2) which combination, LOW-HIIT plus WB-EMS or LOW-HIIT plus 1-RT, yields better results. METHODS: Ninety-three obese metabolic syndrome (MetS) patients undergoing caloric restriction were randomly assigned to four groups performing the different low-volume CT protocols over 12 weeks. Outcomes included cardiometabolic, inflammatory, and fitness parameters. RESULTS: In both combinations, no significant differences were found regarding exercise order. However, the pooled LOW-HIIT and 1-RT group achieved superior improvements in blood pressure, blood lipids, inflammation markers (CRP, hsCRP), the MetS severity score, and overall fitness compared to the LOW-HIIT and WB-EMS combination. Compared to previous studies using these modalities individually, LOW-HIIT plus 1-RT appeared to further reduce inflammation, whereas LOW-HIIT combined with WB-EMS was less effective for cardiometabolic health, potentially due to interference effects between modalities. CONCLUSIONS: While LOW-HIIT plus WB-EMS appears to be a viable option for individuals unable to perform traditional resistance training, the findings suggest prioritizing LOW-HIIT plus 1-RT to maximize health outcomes. These findings highlight the importance of tailored exercise prescriptions and the need for further research into optimizing CT protocols for diverse populations.
Key Findings
1
Further research is needed to optimize concurrent training (CT) protocols for diverse populations
2
LOW-HIIT combined with single-set resistance training (1-RT) yields superior health outcomes compared to LOW-HIIT plus WB-EMS and should be prioritized to maximize benefits
3
LOW-HIIT combined with whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) is a viable option for individuals unable to perform traditional resistance training
4
Tailored exercise prescriptions are important for optimizing cardiometabolic, inflammatory, and fitness outcomes in obese metabolic syndrome patients
Research Object
Obese patients with metabolic syndrome undergoing low-volume concurrent training regimens (LOW-HIIT with WB-EMS or LOW-HIIT with 1-RT)
Research Subject
Effects of different low-volume concurrent training regimens on cardiometabolic health, systemic inflammation, and physical fitness
Publication Details
Publication Date
2025-01-31
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
6
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest