Broad Consent for Future Research: International Perspectives

Широкое согласие на будущие исследования: международные перспективы
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Mark A. Rothstein, Heather L. Harrell, Katie M. Saulnier, Edward S. Dove, Chien-Te Fan, Tzu-Hsun Hung, Obiajulu Nnamuchi, Alexandra Obadia, Gil Siegal
2018-11-01

Common Rulebiobanksbroad consentfuture unspecified researchindividually identifiable biospecimens
Abstract In the United States, final amendments to the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (“the Common Rule”) were published on January 19, 2017, and they will take effect on January 21, 2019. One of the most widely discussed provisions is that for the first time, federal regulations governing research with humans authorize the use of broad consent for future, unspecified research on individually identifiable biospecimens and associated data. Many questions have been raised about broad consent, including what effect it will have on research and whether it adequately protects the interests of research participants. There are lessons to be learned for the U.S. and other countries by looking to countries that already have experience with broad consent for biobank collection and with the storage and subsequent use of the biospecimens and data. This article describes how broad consent works in five countries—Canada (in Quebec), Israel, Nigeria, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom—and with different types of biobanks: national biobanks, federated biobanks, and regional biobanks. Evaluating the provisions and challenges of the broad consent approaches in these countries can inform policies for this increasingly used approach to biobank regulation.
1
Broad consent's impact on research and adequacy in protecting participant interests are widely questioned and unresolved.
2
Countries with existing experience (Canada-Quebec, Israel, Nigeria, Taiwan, UK) offer lessons applicable to US and other nations developing broad consent policies.
3
Evaluating international approaches to broad consent can inform and improve policies for biobank regulation.
4
The Common Rule (US) amendments authorize broad consent for future unspecified research on identifiable biospecimens and associated data starting January 21, 2019.
5
The article analyzes broad consent implementation across different biobank types: national, federated, and regional, highlighting varied provisions and challenges.

Broad consent for future, unspecified research on individually identifiable biospecimens and associated data in biobanks

How broad consent is implemented, its provisions and challenges, and its effects on research and protection of participants across different countries and types of biobanks

Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-11-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Bartha Maria Knoppers
Mark A. Rothstein
Heather L. Harrell
Katie M. Saulnier
Edward S. Dove
Chien-Te Fan
Tzu-Hsun Hung
Obiajulu Nnamuchi
Alexandra Obadia
Gil Siegal
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%