Use of NDVI and Land Surface Temperature for Drought Assessment: Merits and Limitations

Использование NDVI и температуры поверхности земли для оценки засухи: преимущества и ограничения
Marc L. Imhoff, Garik Gutman, Martha C. Anderson, R. T. Pinker, Nurit Agam, Arnon Karnieli, Natalya Panov, Alexander Goldberg
2009-09-14

AVHRRLST–NDVI relationshipLand Surface TemperatureNDVIdrought monitoring
Abstract A large number of water- and climate-related applications, such as drought monitoring, are based on spaceborne-derived relationships between land surface temperature (LST) and the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI). The majority of these applications rely on the existence of a negative slope between the two variables, as identified in site- and time-specific studies. The current paper investigates the generality of the LST–NDVI relationship over a wide range of moisture and climatic/radiation regimes encountered over the North American continent (up to 60°N) during the summer growing season (April–September). Information on LST and NDVI was obtained from long-term (21 years) datasets acquired with the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR). It was found that when water is the limiting factor for vegetation growth (the typical situation for low latitudes of the study area and during the midseason), the LST–NDVI correlation is negative. However, when energy is the limiting factor for vegetation growth (in higher latitudes and elevations, especially at the beginning of the growing season), a positive correlation exists between LST and NDVI. Multiple regression analysis revealed that during the beginning and the end of the growing season, solar radiation is the predominant factor driving the correlation between LST and NDVI, whereas other biophysical variables play a lesser role. Air temperature is the primary factor in midsummer. It is concluded that there is a need to use empirical LST–NDVI relationships with caution and to restrict their application to drought monitoring to areas and periods where negative correlations are observed, namely, to conditions when water—not energy—is the primary factor limiting vegetation growth.
1
Across North America up to 60°N during April–September, LST–NDVI correlation is negative when water limits vegetation growth (typical at lower latitudes and midseason).
2
Air temperature is the primary factor controlling LST–NDVI correlation during midsummer.
3
Empirical LST–NDVI relationships should be used cautiously for drought monitoring and restricted to areas and periods with negative correlations where water limits vegetation growth.
4
Multiple regression shows solar radiation predominantly drives LST–NDVI correlation at the beginning and end of the growing season; other biophysical variables are less important.
5
Spaceborne LST–NDVI relationships commonly used for drought monitoring rely on a negative slope between LST and NDVI identified in site- and time-specific studies.
6
When energy (radiation/temperature) limits vegetation growth (higher latitudes/elevations, especially at start of growing season), LST and NDVI show a positive correlation.

The empirical relationship between land surface temperature (LST) and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) across North American summer growing-season conditions

How the LST–NDVI correlation varies with moisture versus energy limitation (drought vs. radiation/temperature regimes), seasonal timing, latitude/elevation, and the implications for using LST–NDVI relationships in drought monitoring

Publication Details
Publication Date
2009-09-14
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Marc L. Imhoff
Garik Gutman
Martha C. Anderson
R. T. Pinker
Nurit Agam
Arnon Karnieli
Natalya Panov
Alexander Goldberg
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%