Review of photocatalytic water-splitting methods for sustainable hydrogen production
Обзор методов фотокаталитического расщепления воды для устойчивого производства водорода
2016-05-11
SCID: 54.1/586vmg23
Discuss with AI
Au–CdSphotocatalystsphotocatalytic water splittingquantum yieldsustainable hydrogen production
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
This paper examines photocatalytic hydrogen production as a clean energy solution to address challenges of climate change and environmental sustainability. Advantages and disadvantages of various hydrogen production methods, with a particular emphasis on photocatalytic hydrogen production, are discussed in this paper. Social, environmental and economic aspects are taken into account while assessing selected production methods and types of photocatalysts. In the first part of this paper, various hydrogen production options are introduced and comparatively assessed. Then, solar-based hydrogen production options are examined in a more detailed manner along with a comparative performance assessment. Next, photocatalytic hydrogen production options are introduced, photocatalysis mechanisms and principles are discussed and the main groups of photocatalysts, namely titanium oxide, cadmium sulfide, zinc oxide/sulfide and other metal oxide-based photocatalyst groups, are introduced. After discussing recycling issues of photocatalysts, a comparative performance assessment is conducted based on hydrogen production processes (both per mass and surface area of photocatalysts), band gaps and quantum yields. The results show that among individual photocatalysts, on average, Au–CdS has the best performance when band gap, quantum yield and hydrogen production rates are considered. From this perspective, TiO2–ZnO has the poorest performance. Among the photocatalyst groups, cadmium sulfides have the best average performance, while other metal oxides show the poorest rankings, on average. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Key Findings
1
Among individual photocatalysts, Au–CdS shows the best average performance across band gap, quantum yield, and hydrogen production rate metrics.
2
Cadmium sulfide photocatalysts rank highest on average among catalyst groups, whereas TiO2–ZnO performs poorest individually and other metal oxides rank lowest as a group.
3
Photocatalysts are compared using hydrogen production rates per catalyst mass and surface area, band gaps, and quantum yields, with recycling issues also considered.
4
Solar-based hydrogen-production pathways and photocatalytic mechanisms are reviewed alongside major photocatalyst groups, including TiO2, CdS, ZnO/ZnS, and other metal oxides.
5
The paper comparatively assesses hydrogen-production methods using social, environmental, and economic criteria, emphasizing photocatalytic water splitting.
Research Object
photocatalytic water-splitting systems and photocatalysts for hydrogen production
Research Subject
comparative performance, mechanisms, sustainability, and recycling of photocatalytic hydrogen-production methods and photocatalyst groups
Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-05-11
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest