Evaluating Inclusivity and Fairness of AI Recruitment Tools for Hiring People with Disabilities in the United Arab Emirates(UAE)

Оценка инклюзивности и справедливости инструментов искусственного интеллекта для найма людей с инвалидностью в Объединённых Арабских Эмиратах (ОАЭ)
Ambreen Iftikhar, Suleiman Ibrahim Mohammad, Mohammad Alqudah, Ahmad Samed Al‐Adwan, Asokan Vasudevan, Imad Ali, Mohd Farhan
2024-11-11

AI recruitment toolsUnited Arab Emiratesdisability inclusionhiring fairnesssentiment analysis
IntroductionThis research aims to explore the effectiveness and inclusivity of AI-powered recruitment tools in hiring people with disabilities within the United Arab Emirates. Such is the situation where AI integration into the arena of recruitment is increasingly rapid, while there are vital issues on the side of bias, accessibility, and fairness for applicants of diverse needs. MethodsThis study was a mixed-methods approach, examining sentiment analysis, emotion detection, and HR analytics of feedback from applicants with a disability, 415 in total. The research focused on scores referring to sentiment, the progression rate, and the outcome of the final hiring. ResultsThe sentiment score varied significantly across disability types (p-value <0.05). The applicants with cognitive disability expressed the highest sentiment sore while applicants with hearing impairment had the lowest, which indicated the varying adaptability of AI. The emotion analysis depicted a mix of positive and negative emotions. A few applicants liked technology and have trust in it, while others report fear. Clearly, the applicants, both disabled and non-disabled did not differ in their rate of progression (p-value >0.05), hence never indicating any significant difference within the initial steps of the process. The final hiring stage showed significant differences in results with (p-value <0.05), where the proportionate number of disabled applicants was recorded to be lower than that of non-disabled applicants
1
Applicants with and without disabilities showed no significant difference in progression through initial recruitment stages (p-value >0.05).
2
Emotion analysis revealed both positive technology acceptance and trust, alongside fear among some applicants with disabilities and non-disabled applicants.
3
Final hiring outcomes differed significantly (p-value <0.05), with disabled applicants representing a lower proportion of successful hires than non-disabled applicants.
4
Sentiment scores differed significantly across disability types (p-value <0.05), with the highest scores among applicants with cognitive disabilities and the lowest among those with hearing impairments.
5
The study evaluates AI recruitment tools’ inclusivity and fairness for applicants with disabilities in the United Arab Emirates using mixed-methods analysis of 415 applicant responses.

AI-powered recruitment tools and their hiring process for applicants with disabilities in the United Arab Emirates

Inclusivity, fairness, accessibility, sentiment and emotional responses, progression rates, and final hiring outcomes across disability types

Publication Details
Publication Date
2024-11-11
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
125
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Ambreen Iftikhar
Suleiman Ibrahim Mohammad
Mohammad Alqudah
Ahmad Samed Al‐Adwan
Asokan Vasudevan
Imad Ali
Mohd Farhan
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%