A systematic review of rehabilitation and exercise recommendations in oncology guidelines

Систематический обзор рекомендаций по реабилитации и физическим упражнениям в онкологических клинических рекомендациях
Nicole L. Stout, Daniel Santa Mina, Kathleen Doyle Lyons, Karen Robb, Julie K. Silver
2020-10-27

AGREE IIcancer survivorsoncology guidelinesrehabilitation recommendationssystematic review
Guidelines promote high quality cancer care. Rehabilitation recommendations in oncology guidelines have not been characterized and may provide insight to improve integration of rehabilitation into oncology care. This report was developed as a part of the World Health Organization (WHO) Rehabilitation 2030 initiative to identify rehabilitation-specific recommendations in guidelines for oncology care. A systematic review of guidelines was conducted. Only guidelines published in English, for adults with cancer, providing recommendations for rehabilitation referral and assessment or interventions between 2009 and 2019 were included. 13840 articles were identified. After duplicates and applied filters, 4897 articles were screened. 69 guidelines were identified with rehabilitation-specific recommendations. Thirty-seven of the 69 guidelines endorsed referral to rehabilitation services but provided no specific recommendations regarding assessment or interventions. Thirty-two of the 69 guidelines met the full inclusion criteria and were assessed using the AGREE II tool. Twenty-one of these guidelines achieved an AGREE II quality score of ≥ 45 and were fully extracted. Guidelines exclusive to pharmacologic interventions and complementary and alternative interventions were excluded. Findings identify guidelines that recommend rehabilitation services across many cancer types and for various consequences of cancer treatment signifying that rehabilitation is a recognized component of oncology care. However, these findings are at odds with clinical reports of low rehabilitation utilization rates suggesting that guideline recommendations may be overlooked. Considering that functional morbidity negatively affects a majority of cancer survivors, improving guideline concordant rehabilitative care could have substantial impact on function and quality of life among cancer survivors.
1
Despite these recommendations, reported rehabilitation utilization remains low; improving adherence to guidelines could substantially improve function and quality of life for cancer survivors.
2
Guidelines recommended rehabilitation across multiple cancer types and for diverse consequences of cancer treatment, indicating that rehabilitation is recognized as part of oncology care.
3
Of 32 fully eligible guidelines assessed with AGREE II, 21 achieved a quality score of at least 45 and were fully extracted.
4
The systematic review identified 69 English-language oncology guidelines published between 2009 and 2019 containing rehabilitation-specific recommendations for adults with cancer.
5
Thirty-seven guidelines recommended referral to rehabilitation services but provided no specific guidance on rehabilitation assessment or interventions.

Rehabilitation recommendations in oncology care guidelines for adults with cancer

The characterization, quality, coverage, and clinical implementation gap of recommendations for rehabilitation referral, assessment, and interventions across cancer types and treatment-related consequences

Publication Details
Publication Date
2020-10-27
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Nicole L. Stout
Daniel Santa Mina
Kathleen Doyle Lyons
Karen Robb
Julie K. Silver
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%