Exploring the forest--poverty link: key concepts, issues and research implications

Исследование взаимосвязи между лесами и бедностью: ключевые концепции, проблемы и направления исследований
Arild Angelsen, Sven Wunder
2003-01-01

forest-based poverty alleviationlivelihoodsnon-timber forest productspayments for ecosystem servicespoverty reduction
This paper provides a global review of the link from forests to poverty alleviation. Definitions are clarified and the key concepts and indicators related to livelihoods and policy reduction and prevention are explored--distinguishing between the analysis and the measurements of poverty. Reviewing the macro-level literature on the relationship between economic growth, inequality and poverty, the authors found that economic growth usually does trickle down to the poor and that poverty reduction without growth is in practice very difficult to achieve. The potentials and limitations of forests in regard to poverty allevition are canvassed and their possible roles as safety nets, poverty traps and pathways out of poverty are explored. The core discussion addresses how forests can contribute to poverty reduction, distinguishing three main benefit categories. Firstly, non-timber forest products serve subsistence needs, may have important gap filling or safety net functions. Secondly, timber has not traditionally been very pro-poor but the current trends of increased local ownership of natural forests, growing tree commercialisation and small scale wood processing could modify that picture. Thirdly, ecological service payments are emerging rapidly but it is uncertain how much the poor will benefit. In conclusion, this paper outlines ten promising research topics, within three broader fields: assessing current forest-based benefits to the poor; exploring emerging market opportunities; and evaluating cross-cutting institutional and extra-sectoral issues.
1
Economic growth usually benefits poor populations through trickle-down effects, while poverty reduction without growth is difficult to achieve in practice.
2
Forests can function as safety nets, poverty traps, or pathways out of poverty, depending on access, institutions, and livelihood conditions.
3
Non-timber forest products support subsistence and can provide important gap-filling and safety-net functions for poor households.
4
Payments for ecological services are expanding rapidly, yet their benefits for poor populations remain uncertain.
5
The review identifies ten promising research topics spanning current forest-based benefits, emerging markets, and institutional or cross-sectoral issues.
6
Timber has historically offered limited pro-poor benefits, but local forest ownership, tree commercialization, and small-scale processing may improve its contribution.

The link between forests and poverty alleviation

The roles, benefits, and pathways through which forests affect poverty reduction, including subsistence support, safety nets, poverty traps, pathways out of poverty, and emerging market and institutional mechanisms

Publication Details
Publication Date
2003-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Arild Angelsen
Sven Wunder
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%