Opening the Market for Impact Investments: The Need for Adapted Portfolio Tools

Открытие рынка импакт-инвестиций: необходимость адаптированных портфельных инструментов
Lisa Brandstetter, Othmar M. Lehner
2015-01-01

ESG criteriaimpact investinginstitutional investorsportfolio diversificationsocial-impact bonds
Abstract Social and environmental impact investing as an activity as well as a concept has grown in recognition on a truly global scale. Yet, apart from anecdotal success stories of some specialized forms such as social-impact bonds, little is known about the field and the complex interplay between agents, instruments and regulations. Neither the rationales of the various participants in the field, nor the evaluation criteria for some of its instruments have been scrutinized in-depth so far. Especially the important constructs of risk and returns from a financial as well as a social impact perspective have so far been used in differing fashions, thus rendering the applied logic constructs incompatible to each other. Compatibility, however, is a pre-requisite for the inclusion of impact investments into the portfolios of traditional institutional investors. Much can be gained from this, not only would a huge inflow of capital improve the social and environmental sector, but early evidence shows that the overall performance of mixed portfolios might profit because the experienced low correlation of impact investments to traditional markets reduces portfolio risk and increases sustainability. In addition, more and more investors demand ESG (environmental, social and governance) criteria to be considered when it comes to building portfolios because of the great opportunities provided.
1
Adapted portfolio tools and compatible risk-return constructs are necessary to integrate impact investments into traditional institutional-investor portfolios.
2
Existing impact-investment instruments use financial and social definitions of risk and return inconsistently, making evaluation frameworks incompatible.
3
Greater institutional integration could channel substantial capital into social and environmental sectors, while meeting growing investor demand for ESG-based portfolio construction.
4
Impact investing has achieved global recognition, but systematic knowledge about its agents, instruments, regulations, and market interactions remains limited.
5
Impact investments may improve mixed-portfolio performance because their low correlation with traditional markets can reduce portfolio risk and increase sustainability.

Social and environmental impact investments and their integration into institutional investment portfolios

Compatibility of financial and social-impact risk–return evaluation constructs and the need for adapted portfolio tools to enable impact-investment inclusion

Publication Details
Publication Date
2015-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Lisa Brandstetter
Othmar M. Lehner
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%