Does Antitrust Policy Improve Consumer Welfare? Assessing the Evidence

Улучшает ли антимонопольная политика благосостояние потребителей? Оценка эмпирических данных
Robert W. Crandall, Clifford Winston
2003-11-01

antitrust enforcementantitrust policycollusionconsumer welfaremonopolization
This paper reviews the literature and assesses the effects of antitrust policy and enforcement on consumer welfare. We find no evidence that antitrust policy in the areas of monopolization, collusion, and mergers has provided much benefit to consumers and, in some instances, we find evidence that it may have lowered consumer welfare. We also do not find any evidence that antitrust policy has deterred firms from engaging in actions that could harm consumers. We identify various reasons for the apparent ineffectiveness of antitrust policy, offer preliminary policy recommendations, and suggest ways in which economists could more fully assess antitrust policy.
1
In some instances, antitrust policy and enforcement appear to have reduced consumer welfare rather than improved it.
2
The literature review finds no evidence that antitrust policy substantially benefits consumers in monopolization, collusion, or merger cases.
3
The paper identifies possible reasons for antitrust policy’s apparent ineffectiveness and proposes preliminary policy recommendations and research directions.
4
The reviewed evidence shows no indication that antitrust policy deters firms from actions potentially harmful to consumers.

antitrust policy and enforcement in the areas of monopolization, collusion, and mergers

their effects on consumer welfare and deterrence of firms’ potentially harmful actions

Publication Details
Publication Date
2003-11-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Robert W. Crandall
Clifford Winston
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%