The Intellectual Property Implications of Low-Cost 3D Printing

Последствия недорогой 3D-печати для интеллектуальной собственности
Steph Bradshaw, Adrian Bowyer, P Haufe
2010-04-01

3D printingcopyrightdesign protectionintellectual property lawpatents
In the late 1970s 3D printing started to become established as a manufacturing technology. Thirty years on the cost of 3D printing machines is falling to the point where private individuals in the developed world may easily own them. They allow anyone to print complicated engineering parts entirely automatically from design files that it is straightforward to share over the Internet. However, although the widespread use of 3D printers may well have both economic and environmental advantages over conventional methods of manufacturing and distributing goods, there may be concerns that such use could be constrained by the operation of intellectual property (IP) law. This paper examines existing IP legislation and case law in the contexts of the possible wide take-up of this technology by both small firms and private individuals. It splits this examination into five areas: copyright, design protection, patents, trade marks, and passing off. Reassuringly, and perhaps surprisingly, it is concluded that – within the UK at least - private 3D printer owners making items for personal use and not for gain are exempt from the vast majority of IP constraints, and that commercial users, though more restricted, are less so than might be imagined.
1
Commercial 3D-printing users face greater restrictions, but these limitations are less extensive than might be expected.
2
In the UK, private owners producing items for personal, non-commercial use are exempt from most intellectual-property constraints.
3
Low-cost 3D printers enable individuals to automatically manufacture complex engineering parts from design files readily shared online.
4
The paper evaluates how UK copyright, design protection, patent, trademark, and passing-off laws apply to small firms and private users.
5
Widespread 3D-printing adoption may provide economic and environmental advantages over conventional manufacturing and goods distribution.

low-cost 3D printing by private individuals and small firms, including the production of engineering parts from shared design files

the applicability and constraints of UK intellectual property law—copyright, design protection, patents, trade marks, and passing off—for personal and commercial 3D printing

Publication Details
Publication Date
2010-04-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Steph Bradshaw
Adrian Bowyer
P Haufe
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%