Twenty-Year Outcome After Mitral Repair Versus Replacement for Severe Degenerative Mitral Regurgitation
Двадцатилетние результаты после пластики или замены митрального клапана при тяжелой дегенеративной митральной регургитации
2016-11-29
SCID: 54.1/6b939fqr
Discuss with AI
degenerative mitral regurgitationflail leafletmitral valve repairmitral valve replacementpropensity score matching
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
BACKGROUND: Mitral valve (MV) repair is preferred over replacement in clinical guidelines and is an important determinant of the indication for surgery in degenerative mitral regurgitation. However, the level of evidence supporting current recommendations is low, and recent data cast doubts on its validity in the current era. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to analyze very long-term outcome after MV repair and replacement for degenerative mitral regurgitation with a flail leaflet. METHODS: MIDA (Mitral Regurgitation International Database) is a multicenter registry enrolling patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation with a flail leaflet in 6 tertiary European and US centers. We analyzed the outcome after MV repair (n=1709) and replacement (n=213) overall, by propensity score matching, and by inverse probability-of-treatment weighting. RESULTS: At baseline, patients undergoing MV repair were younger, had more comorbidities, and were more likely to present with a posterior leaflet prolapse than those undergoing MV replacement. After propensity score matching and inverse probability-of-treatment weighting, the 2 treatments groups were balanced, and absolute standardized differences were usually <10%, indicating adequate match. Operative mortality (defined as a death occurring within 30 days from surgery or during the same hospitalization) was lower after MV repair than after replacement in both the entire population (1.3% versus 4.7%; P<0.001) and the propensity-matched population (0.2% versus 4.4%; P<0.001). During a mean follow-up of 9.2 years, 552 deaths were observed, of which 207 were of cardiovascular origin. Twenty-year survival was better after MV repair than after MV replacement in both the entire population (46% versus 23%; P<0.001) and the matched population (41% versus 24%; P<0.001). Similar superiority of MV repair was obtained in patient subsets on the basis of age, sex, or any stratification criteria (all P<0.001). MV repair was also associated with reduced incidence of reoperations and valve-related complications. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation with a flail leaflet referred to mitral surgery, MV repair was associated with lower operative mortality, better long-term survival, and fewer valve-related complications compared with MV replacement.
Key Findings
1
After propensity matching and inverse probability weighting, repair and replacement groups were well balanced, with absolute standardized differences usually below 10%.
2
During a mean 9.2-year follow-up, 20-year survival favored repair in both the overall cohort (46% vs 23%) and matched cohort (41% vs 24%).
3
In a multicenter registry of degenerative mitral regurgitation with a flail leaflet, 1,709 patients underwent repair and 213 underwent replacement.
4
Operative mortality was significantly lower after mitral repair than replacement in the overall cohort (1.3% vs 4.7%) and matched cohort (0.2% vs 4.4%).
5
The survival advantage of mitral repair remained consistent across patient subsets stratified by age, sex, and other criteria.
Research Object
Patients with severe degenerative mitral regurgitation and a flail mitral-valve leaflet undergoing mitral valve repair or replacement
Research Subject
Twenty-year clinical outcomes, including operative mortality and long-term survival, comparing mitral valve repair with replacement
Publication Details
Publication Date
2016-11-29
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest