On linguoculturology and cultural linguistics
О лингвокультурологии и культурной лингвистике
2019-01-01
SCID: 54.1/6c8n4mx6
Discuss with AI
Natural Semantic Metalanguagecultural linguisticslinguoculturologyterminological indifferencetranslation of programmatic texts
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Few Western scholars are likely to be aware that behind the noun linguoculturology and the adjective linguoculturological lie realities they may not be entirely familiar with. Most will no doubt unhesitatingly assume that the labels in question are no more than a different way of referring to what, in Western Europe, the Americas, and Australia / New Zealand, is called cultural linguistics. Yet, what we are witnessing here is anything but terminological variation. It is terminological indifference of a kind that is common in most areas of scholarly activity, not in the least among linguists, many of whom use identical terms for different purposes, and different terms for identical purposes, thereby stifling progress instead of inviting dialogue, and promoting indifference rather than engaging in collaborative efforts. Mizin and Korostenski (2019) take the translators of two recent papers to task for the kind of terminological indifference referred to above. Both Sharifian (2015) and Peeters (2017) were originally written in English and then translated into Russian to draw the attention of post-Soviet scientists to developments in cultural linguistics in the Western world. I revisit each of these texts, before reaching the conclusion that we need to increase awareness in both directions. The ongoing translation of important programmatic texts from English into Russian and vice versa is crucial, and so is the publication of introductory materials, critical assessments, and terminological dictionaries. They will allow Western linguists to further familiarize themselves with the theoretical underpinnings and empirical findings of linguoculturology, and help post-Soviet science transcend the geographic and ideological area to which it is still largely confined. The publication, in different issues of the 2020 volume of this journal, of revised versions of the four introductory lectures on the Natural Semantic Metalanguage approach I had the pleasure of delivering at Novosibirsk State University in June 2019 will hopefully help achieve some of the cross-fertilization contemporary cultural linguistics so badly needs.
Key Findings
1
Publishing introductory materials, critical assessments, and terminological dictionaries will help Western linguists understand linguoculturology and help post‑Soviet science transcend geographic and ideological confines.
2
Revised lectures on the Natural Semantic Metalanguage delivered in Novosibirsk (2020 journal issues) are intended to promote cross‑fertilization in contemporary cultural linguistics.
3
Terminological indifference—using identical terms for different purposes and vice versa—hinders scholarly progress and dialogue in linguistics.
4
The terms linguoculturology and cultural linguistics are not simply terminological variants; they reflect substantive differences and terminological indifference.
5
Translations of key programmatic texts between English and Russian are crucial to increase mutual awareness between Western and post‑Soviet scholars.
Research Object
linguoculturology (the scholarly field/practice of studying language-culture relations) and its relation to cultural linguistics
Research Subject
terminological differences, awareness, and cross-cultural scholarly exchange needed to integrate theoretical underpinnings, empirical findings, translations, and introductory/critical materials between linguoculturology and Western cultural linguistics
Publication Details
Publication Date
2019-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest