A potential overestimation of CO <sub>2</sub> physiological effects on evapotranspiration
Возможная переоценка физиологического влияния CO2 на испарение и транспирацию
2026-06-24
SCID: 54.1/6chyhz6r
Discuss with AI
CO2 physiological forcingevapotranspiration reductionstomatal conductancevapor pressure deficit (VPD) feedbackvegetation-mediated albedo change
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
It is generally believed that CO 2 physiological forcing can partially mitigate land surface drying under global warming by reducing stomatal conductance and evapotranspiration. Most of this type of study focuses on the direct regulation by vegetation physiology, overlooking interactive feedback from the atmosphere. Using fully coupled earth system model simulations, we find that the physiological benefit may have been optimistically overestimated. Vegetation-induced energy change may in turn further affect atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD), exerting extra evapotranspiration demand indirectly. Indirect VPD feedback over northern mid-high latitudes could offset 54% (±26%) of evapotranspiration reduction driven by stomatal closure under current CO 2 condition, and that proportion increases to 68% (±18%) at 4 × CO 2 . The enhanced VPD feedback is largely driven by vegetation-mediated albedo decline and temperature rise in northern mid-high latitudes, which intensifies evapotranspiration loss as stomatal constraints are minimal. These are important findings, substantially limiting the physiological benefits of CO 2 with extra pressure on surface aridification and water resources.
Key Findings
1
Accounting for indirect atmospheric feedbacks substantially limits CO2 physiological benefits and increases pressure on surface aridification and water resources.
2
At 4× CO2, the indirect VPD feedback in northern mid-high latitudes increases and offsets 68% (±18%) of stomatal-closure-driven evapotranspiration reduction.
3
CO2 physiological forcing benefits on reducing evapotranspiration have likely been overestimated when atmospheric feedbacks are ignored.
4
Enhanced VPD feedback is mainly caused by vegetation-mediated albedo decline and temperature rise in northern mid-high latitudes, intensifying evapotranspiration where stomatal constraints are minimal.
5
Indirect VPD feedback over northern mid-high latitudes offsets 54% (±26%) of evapotranspiration reduction at current CO2 levels.
6
Vegetation-induced energy changes alter atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD), indirectly increasing evaporative demand and offsetting stomatal-driven ET reductions.
Research Object
CO2 physiological effects on land-surface evapotranspiration as represented in fully coupled Earth system model simulations
Research Subject
Magnitude and feedbacks of CO2-driven physiological changes (stomatal closure reducing evapotranspiration) including indirect atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (VPD) feedbacks mediated by vegetation-induced energy, albedo and temperature changes that offset evapotranspiration reduction
Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-06-24
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
0
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest