Characterization techniques for nanoparticles: comparison and complementarity upon studying nanoparticle properties
Методы характеризации наночастиц: сравнение и взаимодополняемость при изучении свойств наночастиц
2018-01-01
SCID: 54.1/6hb26jzf
Discuss with AI
crystal structureelemental compositionnanomaterialsnanoparticle characterizationreproducible characterization
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
Nanostructures have attracted huge interest as a rapidly growing class of materials for many applications. Several techniques have been used to characterize the size, crystal structure, elemental composition and a variety of other physical properties of nanoparticles. In several cases, there are physical properties that can be evaluated by more than one technique. Different strengths and limitations of each technique complicate the choice of the most suitable method, while often a combinatorial characterization approach is needed. In addition, given that the significance of nanoparticles in basic research and applications is constantly increasing, it is necessary that researchers from separate fields overcome the challenges in the reproducible and reliable characterization of nanomaterials, after their synthesis and further process (e.g. annealing) stages. The principal objective of this review is to summarize the present knowledge on the use, advances, advantages and weaknesses of a large number of experimental techniques that are available for the characterization of nanoparticles. Different characterization techniques are classified according to the concept/group of the technique used, the information they can provide, or the materials that they are destined for. We describe the main characteristics of the techniques and their operation principles and we give various examples of their use, presenting them in a comparative mode, when possible, in relation to the property studied in each case.
Key Findings
1
Characterization methods are classified by technique concept, information provided, and target material, enabling comparative selection according to the property being studied.
2
Nanoparticle characterization requires multiple complementary techniques because individual methods differ in strengths, limitations, and measurable properties.
3
Reliable and reproducible nanoparticle characterization remains challenging across synthesis and post-processing stages such as annealing.
4
The review surveys advances, operating principles, advantages, and weaknesses of numerous techniques for determining nanoparticle size, crystal structure, elemental composition, and other physical properties.
5
The review uses comparative examples to clarify how different experimental techniques complement one another in nanoparticle property assessment.
Research Object
Nanoparticles
Research Subject
the comparative characterization of nanoparticle properties, including size, crystal structure, elemental composition, and other physical properties, using complementary experimental techniques
Publication Details
Publication Date
2018-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest