Brand Confusion in Advertising

Путаница брендов в рекламе
Theo B.C. Poiesz, T.M.M. Verhallen
1989-01-01

advertising effectivenessadvertising for competitorbrand confusioncauses of brand confusioncounter-effective advertising
The question of advertising effectiveness (i.e., to what extent is advertising effective or ineffective?) is possibly the most important question asked of or by advertisers. In this article, the authors provide evidence that advertising may also be counter-effective, that is, produce results that an advertiser specifically wants to avoid. Brand confusion is one such undesired result: the advertisement for brand A is taken by consumers as promoting brand B. In other words, the advertiser finances an advertisement for his competitor. In the second part of the article, several possible causes of brand confusion are presented, and practical advertising implications are discussed.
1
Advertising can be counter-effective by producing results advertisers want to avoid, not just effective outcomes.
2
Brand confusion leads advertisers to inadvertently finance promotion of their competitors.
3
Brand confusion occurs when consumers interpret an advertisement for brand A as promoting brand B.
4
The article discusses practical advertising implications to mitigate or address brand confusion.
5
The article identifies several possible causes of brand confusion (detailed causes discussed in the paper).

Advertisements for a brand (advertisements for brand A)

Brand confusion where consumers interpret an advertisement for brand A as promoting brand B, including its causes and practical advertising implications

Publication Details
Publication Date
1989-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Theo B.C. Poiesz
T.M.M. Verhallen
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%