Enhanced 4D seismic outcomes through true 4D processing — Usan field
Улучшенные результаты 4D-сейсморазведки за счёт истинной 4D-обработки — месторождение Усан
2026-02-10
SCID: 54.1/6krzrv2t
Discuss with AI
4D co-denoise4D debubble and 4D demultiple4D water column correction (WCC)multi-realization binningtrue 4D processing
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The Usan field, located offshore Nigeria, has a well-established history of deriving significant value from 4D seismic analysis. The recent 2023 Monitor (M3) survey was processed alongside the baseline survey (M1) through a carefully structured, two-phase workflow. Phase 1 focused on improving 3D data quality, leveraging historic processing flows (Agnisola et al., 2019) while integrating lessons learned from previous projects. Key advancements in this phase included shot-by-shot debubble, 3D sparse Tau-P inversion for precise deghosting, curveletbased multiple subtraction, 4D regularization, and detailed velocity model building. While primarily 3D-focused, Phase 1 incorporated QC checks of 4D attributes to ensure alignment with future processing goals. In Phase 2, the workflow transitioned to true 4D processing, implementing advanced techniques such as multi-realization binning, 4D water column correction (WCC), 4D debubble, 4D demultiple and 4D co-denoise. These comprehensive steps resulted in significant improvements in data repeatability and signal fidelity, ensuring that the processed data met the stringent requirements of 4D seismic analysis. By integrating these advanced methodologies across both phases, the project successfully delivered high-quality 4D seismic data, providing crucial insights for effective reservoir management.
Key Findings
1
A two-phase workflow processed the 2023 Monitor (M3) and baseline (M1) surveys to enhance 4D seismic outcomes for the Usan field.
2
Phase 1 improved 3D data quality using shot-by-shot debubble, 3D sparse Tau-P deghosting, curvelet-based multiple subtraction, 4D regularization, and detailed velocity model building.
3
Phase 1 included 4D attribute QC to align 3D processing with subsequent 4D goals.
4
Phase 2 implemented true 4D processing techniques—multi-realization binning, 4D water column correction, 4D debubble, 4D demultiple, and 4D co-denoise.
5
The combined two-phase approach significantly improved data repeatability and signal fidelity, producing high-quality 4D seismic data suitable for reservoir management.
Research Object
Usan field 4D seismic data (Monitor M3 survey and baseline M1 survey) processed through a two-phase workflow
Research Subject
Improvements in 4D seismic data quality, repeatability, and signal fidelity achieved by applying true 4D processing techniques (multi-realization binning, 4D WCC, 4D debubble, 4D demultiple, 4D co-denoise) following an initial 3D-focused enhancement phase
Publication Details
Publication Date
2026-02-10
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Cited by
0
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest