Neo-Liberalism and Marketisation: The Implications for Higher Education
Неолиберализм и маркетизация: последствия для высшего образования
2006-03-01
SCID: 54.1/6nbuhgu7
Discuss with AI
higher educationmarketisation of educationneoliberalismprivatisation of public servicespublic intellectuals
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
This article is based on a keynote paper presented to the European Conference on Educational Research (ECER), University College Dublin, 5–9 September 2005. The massification of education in European countries over the last 100 years has produced cultures and societies that have benefited greatly from state investment in education. To maintain this level of social and economic development that derives from high quality education requires continual state investment. With the rise of the New Right, neo-liberal agenda, there is an attempt to offload the cost of education, and indeed other public services such as housing, transport, care services etc., on to the individual. There is an increasing attempt to privatise public services, including education, so that citizens will have to buy them at market value rather than have them provided by the state. Europe is no exception to this trend of neo-liberalisation. Recent Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) reports, including one on higher education in Ireland, (2004), concentrate strongly on the role of education in servicing the economy to the neglect of its social and developmental responsibilities. The view that education is simply another market commodity has become normalised in policy and public discourses. Schools run purely as businesses are a growing phenomenon within and without Europe, and there is an increasing expectation in several countries that schools will supplement their income from private sources, even though they are within the state sector. In this article, the writer presents both a critique of the neo-liberal model of marketised education and a challenge to academics to work as public intellectuals both individually and with civil society organisations to develop a counter-hegemonic discourse to neo-liberalism for higher education.
Key Findings
1
Massification of European education generated substantial social and economic benefits through sustained state investment in high-quality education.
2
OECD policy discourses increasingly frame higher education primarily as serving economic needs, neglecting its social and developmental responsibilities.
3
The article calls on academics to act as public intellectuals and collaborate with civil society to develop a counter-hegemonic alternative to neo-liberalised higher education.
4
The neo-liberal agenda seeks to shift education and other public-service costs from the state to individuals through privatisation and market-based provision.
5
Treating education as a market commodity has become normalised, alongside growing expectations that state-sector schools obtain income from private sources.
Research Object
higher education under neoliberal marketisation
Research Subject
the implications, effects, and critique of transferring the costs and governance of higher education from the state to individuals and markets, including its social and developmental consequences
Publication Details
Publication Date
2006-03-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest