A Comparison of Paracentesis and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunting in Patients with Ascites

Сравнение парацентеза и трансъюгулярного внутрипечёночного портосистемного шунтирования у пациентов с асцитом
Alexander L. Gerbes, Peter Deibert, V. Siegerstetter, Martin Rössle, Andreas Ochs, Veit Gülberg, Joseph Holl, Manfred Olschewski, Maximilian Reiser
2000-06-08

cirrhosislarge-volume paracentesisrefractory ascitessurvival without liver transplantationtransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
BACKGROUND: In patients with cirrhosis and ascites, creation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt may reduce the ascites and improve renal function. However, the benefit of this procedure as compared with that of large-volume paracentesis is uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 60 patients with cirrhosis and refractory or recurrent ascites (Child-Pugh class B in 42 patients and class C in 18 patients) to treatment with a transjugular shunt (29 patients) or large-volume paracentesis (31 patients). The mean (+/-SD) duration of follow-up was 45+/-16 months among those assigned to shunting and 44+/-18 months among those assigned to paracentesis. The primary outcome was survival without liver transplantation. RESULTS: Among the patients in the shunt group, 15 died and 1 underwent liver transplantation during the study period, as compared with 23 patients and 2 patients, respectively, in the paracentesis group. The probability of survival without liver transplantation was 69 percent at one year and 58 percent at two years in the shunt group, as compared with 52 percent and 32 percent in the paracentesis group (P=0.11 for the overall comparison, by the log-rank test). In a multivariate analysis, treatment with transjugular shunting was independently associated with survival without the need for transplantation (P=0.02). At three months, 61 percent of the patients in the shunt group and 18 percent of those in the paracentesis group had no ascites (P=0.006). The frequency of hepatic encephalopathy was similar in the two groups. Of the patients assigned to paracentesis in whom this procedure was unsuccessful, 10 received a transjugular shunt a mean of 5.5+/-4 months after randomization; 4 had a response to this rescue treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with large-volume paracentesis, the creation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt can improve the chance of survival without liver transplantation in patients with refractory or recurrent ascites.
1
Among patients whose paracentesis treatment failed, rescue shunting produced a response in 4 of 10 patients.
2
Hepatic encephalopathy occurred with similar frequency after transjugular shunting and paracentesis.
3
In 60 cirrhotic patients with refractory or recurrent ascites, transjugular shunting showed higher one- and two-year transplant-free survival than large-volume paracentesis.
4
Shunting provided substantially better ascites control: 61% had no ascites at three months versus 18% after paracentesis (P=0.006).
5
Transjugular shunting was independently associated with transplant-free survival in multivariate analysis (P=0.02), although the overall survival comparison was not statistically significant (P=0.11).

Patients with cirrhosis and refractory or recurrent ascites treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting or large-volume paracentesis

Comparative effects of the two treatments on survival without liver transplantation, ascites control, renal function, and hepatic encephalopathy

Publication Details
Publication Date
2000-06-08
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Alexander L. Gerbes
Peter Deibert
V. Siegerstetter
Martin Rössle
Andreas Ochs
Veit Gülberg
Joseph Holl
Manfred Olschewski
Maximilian Reiser
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%