A Comparison of Paracentesis and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunting in Patients with Ascites
Сравнение парацентеза и трансъюгулярного внутрипечёночного портосистемного шунтирования у пациентов с асцитом
2000-06-08
SCID: 54.1/6nvnkp9d
Discuss with AI
cirrhosislarge-volume paracentesisrefractory ascitessurvival without liver transplantationtransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
BACKGROUND: In patients with cirrhosis and ascites, creation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt may reduce the ascites and improve renal function. However, the benefit of this procedure as compared with that of large-volume paracentesis is uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned 60 patients with cirrhosis and refractory or recurrent ascites (Child-Pugh class B in 42 patients and class C in 18 patients) to treatment with a transjugular shunt (29 patients) or large-volume paracentesis (31 patients). The mean (+/-SD) duration of follow-up was 45+/-16 months among those assigned to shunting and 44+/-18 months among those assigned to paracentesis. The primary outcome was survival without liver transplantation. RESULTS: Among the patients in the shunt group, 15 died and 1 underwent liver transplantation during the study period, as compared with 23 patients and 2 patients, respectively, in the paracentesis group. The probability of survival without liver transplantation was 69 percent at one year and 58 percent at two years in the shunt group, as compared with 52 percent and 32 percent in the paracentesis group (P=0.11 for the overall comparison, by the log-rank test). In a multivariate analysis, treatment with transjugular shunting was independently associated with survival without the need for transplantation (P=0.02). At three months, 61 percent of the patients in the shunt group and 18 percent of those in the paracentesis group had no ascites (P=0.006). The frequency of hepatic encephalopathy was similar in the two groups. Of the patients assigned to paracentesis in whom this procedure was unsuccessful, 10 received a transjugular shunt a mean of 5.5+/-4 months after randomization; 4 had a response to this rescue treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with large-volume paracentesis, the creation of a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt can improve the chance of survival without liver transplantation in patients with refractory or recurrent ascites.
Key Findings
1
Among patients whose paracentesis treatment failed, rescue shunting produced a response in 4 of 10 patients.
2
Hepatic encephalopathy occurred with similar frequency after transjugular shunting and paracentesis.
3
In 60 cirrhotic patients with refractory or recurrent ascites, transjugular shunting showed higher one- and two-year transplant-free survival than large-volume paracentesis.
4
Shunting provided substantially better ascites control: 61% had no ascites at three months versus 18% after paracentesis (P=0.006).
5
Transjugular shunting was independently associated with transplant-free survival in multivariate analysis (P=0.02), although the overall survival comparison was not statistically significant (P=0.11).
Research Object
Patients with cirrhosis and refractory or recurrent ascites treated with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting or large-volume paracentesis
Research Subject
Comparative effects of the two treatments on survival without liver transplantation, ascites control, renal function, and hepatic encephalopathy
Publication Details
Publication Date
2000-06-08
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest