Shamanism, History, and the State
Шаманизм, история и государство
1994-01-01
SCID: 54.1/737zpdg6
Discuss with AI
case studies in shamanismhistorical processes in shamanismpolitical dynamics of shamanismshamanismstate and institutions
Figures from the paper
Abstract (AI)
The literature on shamanism and related topics is extensive, but has in general been biased toward curing and trance; the political and historical significance of shamanic activities has been largely neglected. The contributors Shamanism, History, and the State--distinguished anthropologists and historians from England, Australia, and France--show that shamanism is not static and stable, but always changing as a result of political dynamics and historical processes.Contributors are Tamsyn Barton, Sysan Bayly, Mary Beard, Maurice Bloch, Peter Gow, Roberte N. Hamayon, Stephen Hugh-Jones, Humphrey, and Nicholas Thomas.The importance of this collection lies in the painstaking, many-sided ways in which it shows 'shamanism' to be a multifarious and continuously changing 'dialogue' or interaction with specific, local contexts. . . . Thus, rather than tackling the issue in principle, this collection tries to demonstrate through 'case studies' just how different 'shamanism' becomes if seen through a lens sensitive to history and the influence of institutions, such as the state, which seem far removed from it. I think the demonstrations add up to an impressive force. --Michael TaussigThis new, ably edited volume provides . . . chapters that are rich in historic detail and that provide insights into general cultural processes and social interactions. --HistorianNicholas Thomas is Queen Elizabeth II Research Fellow, Department of Prehistory and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra. He is the author of Out of Time: History and Evolution in Anthropological Discourse. Caroline Humphrey, author of Karl Marx Collective: Economy, Society and Religion in a Siberian Collective Farm, is Fellow of King's College and Lecturer in Social Anthropology, University of Cambridge.
Key Findings
1
Case studies in the volume demonstrate how shamanism varies when analyzed through historically and institutionally sensitive lenses.
2
Existing literature on shamanism has been biased toward curing and trance, neglecting political and historical significance.
3
Shamanic practices should be understood as multifarious, context-specific dialogues or interactions with local institutions, including the state.
4
Shamanism is not static or stable but constantly changes due to political dynamics and historical processes.
5
The collection provides rich historical detail offering insights into broader cultural processes and social interactions involving shamanism.
Research Object
Shamanism as practiced across historical and political contexts
Research Subject
How shamanic practices change and interact with political dynamics, historical processes, institutions (notably the state), and local contexts as revealed by case studies
Publication Details
Publication Date
1994-01-01
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Open access PDF
Access Type
Author Information
Download PDF
Subscribe to digest