Prophylactic mesh at end‐colostomy construction reduces parastomal hernia rate: a randomized trial

Профилактическая установка сетчатого имплантата при формировании концевой колостомы снижает частоту парастомальных грыж: рандомизированное исследование
Jan Roland Lambrecht, Stein Gunnar Larsen, O Reiertsen, Arild Vaktskjold, Lars Julsrud, Kjersti Flatmark
2015-07-14

end-colostomyparastomal herniaprophylactic meshrandomized trialretromuscular synthetic mesh
AIM: Parastomal hernia (PSH) is the most common complication of an end-colostomy and about one-quarter of patients need operative repair, which is often unsuccessful. A randomized trial was carried out to compare the results of using mesh or no mesh at the time of formation of a colostomy with the clinical identification of PSH as the primary outcome. METHOD: In this two-centre randomized trial (Oslo University Hospital and Sykehuset Innlandet Hospital Trust, Norway), patients with rectal cancer undergoing open pelvic surgery were randomized to receive a retromuscular synthetic mesh (study group, n = 32) or no mesh (control group, n = 26) at the time of end-colostomy formation. Postoperative follow up was not blinded and included clinical examination and routine CT. RESULTS: The median period of follow up was 40 (range: 84) months. There were no differences in demographic variables or complications between the study and control groups. PSH developed in two patients of the study group and in 12 of the control group [OR = 0.04 (95% CI: 0.01-0.30) and hazard ratio 0.134 (95% CI: 0.030-0.603); P < 0.001]. The number needed to treat to avoid one PSH was 2.5 patients. CT demonstrated an increase over time in the size of the fascial orifice in patients with PSH without mesh prophylaxis, in contrast to a stable size in patients with mesh and in the control patients who did not develop PSH. CONCLUSION: The retromuscular insertion of synthetic mesh at the time of formation of an end-colostomy reduced the risk of PSH.
1
A randomized two-centre trial evaluated retromuscular synthetic mesh during end-colostomy construction in patients undergoing open rectal cancer surgery.
2
CT showed progressive enlargement of the fascial orifice without mesh, whereas the orifice remained stable with mesh and in non-hernia controls.
3
Mesh prophylaxis substantially reduced parastomal hernia risk, with odds ratio 0.04, hazard ratio 0.134, and P < 0.001.
4
Parastomal hernia occurred in 2 of 32 mesh-treated patients versus 12 of 26 controls during a median 40-month follow-up.
5
The number needed to treat was 2.5 patients to prevent one parastomal hernia.

End-colostomy construction in patients undergoing open pelvic surgery for rectal cancer

The effect of prophylactic retromuscular synthetic mesh on the incidence and progression of parastomal hernia

Publication Details
Publication Date
2015-07-14
Journal
Publisher
ISSN
Access Type
Author Information
Authors
Jan Roland Lambrecht
Stein Gunnar Larsen
O Reiertsen
Arild Vaktskjold
Lars Julsrud
Kjersti Flatmark
Explore further
Open the scid.ai AI chat with a ready-made request: it will find papers on a similar topic and help build a literature review.
Find similar papers in the chat
Make a presentation
100%